Scholarlink

Background <p>Road traffic accidents are a major healthcare concern worldwide. To improve outcomes for patients injured in motor vehicle crashes, it is crucial to understand the factors associated with mortality and anatomically specific injury severity. Seat position is one of the possible determinants of road traffic injury fatality; however, evidence regarding which seat positions are linked to impaired survival outcomes and anatomically severe injuries remains scarce.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients injured in four-wheeled vehicle accidents between 2000 and 2022 and admitted to a community teaching hospital in Japan. Seat position was classified as driver seat, front passenger seat, or rear passenger seat. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Other outcomes included severe trauma, defined as an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of &gt; 15, and anatomically specific severe injuries of the head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and extremities, defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥ 3.</p> Results <p>Among 5,906 eligible patients, 4,104 (69.5%) were driver seat occupants, 1,009 (17.1%) were front passenger seat occupants, and 793 (13.4%) were rear passenger seat occupants. After adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, admission year, season, presentation time, presentation day, prehospital length of stay, vehicle configuration, collision type, seatbelt use, airbag deployment, and involvement in high-energy trauma using logistic regression analysis, rear passenger seat occupants had a lower risk of hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.396; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.216–0.727) and a lower risk of severe trauma with an ISS of &gt; 15 (AOR, 0.428; 95% CI, 0.308–0.596) than driver seat occupants. Additionally, rear seat occupants were less likely to sustain serious injuries to the chest (AOR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.333–0.673) and abdominal or pelvic contents (AOR, 0.373; 95% CI, 0.218–0.639) than driver seat occupants.</p> Conclusion <p>Our results suggest that driver seat occupants require special attention because of their higher risk of adverse outcomes and anatomically severe injuries. These findings will be useful for vehicle occupants, emergency medical professionals, and automobile manufacturers.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Impact of seat position on survival outcomes and anatomically specific severe injury patterns in four-wheeled motor vehicle accidents: a retrospective cohort study at a community emergency department in Japan

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月30日

查看全文
  • Tasuku Uzawa,
  • Yuko Ono,
  • Jun Sugiyama,
  • Kazushi Takayama,
  • Nobuto Nakanishi,
  • Takeyasu Kakamu,
  • Tokiya Ishida,
  • Nozomi Tomita,
  • Kazuaki Shinohara,
  • Joji Kotani

摘要

Background

Road traffic accidents are a major healthcare concern worldwide. To improve outcomes for patients injured in motor vehicle crashes, it is crucial to understand the factors associated with mortality and anatomically specific injury severity. Seat position is one of the possible determinants of road traffic injury fatality; however, evidence regarding which seat positions are linked to impaired survival outcomes and anatomically severe injuries remains scarce.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients injured in four-wheeled vehicle accidents between 2000 and 2022 and admitted to a community teaching hospital in Japan. Seat position was classified as driver seat, front passenger seat, or rear passenger seat. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Other outcomes included severe trauma, defined as an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > 15, and anatomically specific severe injuries of the head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and extremities, defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥ 3.

Results

Among 5,906 eligible patients, 4,104 (69.5%) were driver seat occupants, 1,009 (17.1%) were front passenger seat occupants, and 793 (13.4%) were rear passenger seat occupants. After adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, admission year, season, presentation time, presentation day, prehospital length of stay, vehicle configuration, collision type, seatbelt use, airbag deployment, and involvement in high-energy trauma using logistic regression analysis, rear passenger seat occupants had a lower risk of hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.396; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.216–0.727) and a lower risk of severe trauma with an ISS of > 15 (AOR, 0.428; 95% CI, 0.308–0.596) than driver seat occupants. Additionally, rear seat occupants were less likely to sustain serious injuries to the chest (AOR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.333–0.673) and abdominal or pelvic contents (AOR, 0.373; 95% CI, 0.218–0.639) than driver seat occupants.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that driver seat occupants require special attention because of their higher risk of adverse outcomes and anatomically severe injuries. These findings will be useful for vehicle occupants, emergency medical professionals, and automobile manufacturers.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.