Scholarlink

Background <p>Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) represents an increasing proportion of patients presenting with angina, yet these patients face significant cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to explore distinct classes in NOCAD patients based on demographic characteristics, clinical comorbidities, and inflammatory biomarkers, and to investigate their associations with prognosis.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with NOCAD by coronary angiography for angina between January 1, 2023, and December 1, 2024, with follow-up until August 1, 2025. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was employed to identify distinct classes based on demographic features, inflammatory markers, including 8 composite inflammatory indices. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between different classes and individual inflammatory markers with clinical outcomes after multivariate adjustment. Prognostic discrimination compared with traditional risk factors was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p> Results <p>Among 342 NOCAD patients, LCA identified three distinct classes: low-inflammation with few comorbidities (<i>n</i> = 156, 45.6%), elderly with multiple comorbidities (<i>n</i> = 126, 36.8%), and high-inflammation subgroup (<i>n</i> = 60, 17.5%). Over a median follow-up of 363 days (interquartile range, 193–613 days), 89 patients (26.0%) experienced MACEs. In fully adjusted models, the high-inflammation class was the strongest predictor of MACEs (HR 3.090, 95% CI: 1.614–5.919), followed by the elderly with multiple comorbidities class (HR 2.181, 95% CI: 1.224–3.886). Among 8 composite inflammatory indices evaluated, three demonstrated significant associations with MACEs: the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index (per unit increase in Z-score, HR 0.402, 95% CI: 0.230–0.703), neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR) index (per unit increase in Z-score, HR 1.234, 95% CI: 1.002–1.522), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) index (Z-score &gt; 0, HR 1.635, 95% CI: 1.007–2.655). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in MACE-free survival across the three classes (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.001), with CALLY, NAR, and AISI also showing significant prognostic discrimination. Component analysis revealed the high-inflammation phenotype was independently associated with a 2.44-fold increased risk of hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure (HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.230–4.846), accounting for 60.67% of total MACEs. These findings were consistently reproduced in a sensitivity analysis restricted to patients without a history of myocardial infarction.</p> Conclusion <p>Inflammatory and clinical phenotyping identifies distinct risk subgroups in NOCAD. While the high-inflammation phenotype is associated with the highest overall MACEs risk, this prognostic signal is predominantly driven by hospitalizations for unstable angina or heart failure. These findings suggest that inflammation-based phenotyping could serve as an exploratory complementary tool for risk stratification, requiring further external validation before any routine clinical application.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Inflammation-based phenotyping and prognostic implications in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月25日

查看全文
  • Yutao Liu,
  • Shuyi Hu,
  • Ruobin Wu,
  • Tao Fu,
  • Zhiyong Li,
  • Jingyi Zhang,
  • Ming Zhang

摘要

Background

Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) represents an increasing proportion of patients presenting with angina, yet these patients face significant cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to explore distinct classes in NOCAD patients based on demographic characteristics, clinical comorbidities, and inflammatory biomarkers, and to investigate their associations with prognosis.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with NOCAD by coronary angiography for angina between January 1, 2023, and December 1, 2024, with follow-up until August 1, 2025. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was employed to identify distinct classes based on demographic features, inflammatory markers, including 8 composite inflammatory indices. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between different classes and individual inflammatory markers with clinical outcomes after multivariate adjustment. Prognostic discrimination compared with traditional risk factors was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Among 342 NOCAD patients, LCA identified three distinct classes: low-inflammation with few comorbidities (n = 156, 45.6%), elderly with multiple comorbidities (n = 126, 36.8%), and high-inflammation subgroup (n = 60, 17.5%). Over a median follow-up of 363 days (interquartile range, 193–613 days), 89 patients (26.0%) experienced MACEs. In fully adjusted models, the high-inflammation class was the strongest predictor of MACEs (HR 3.090, 95% CI: 1.614–5.919), followed by the elderly with multiple comorbidities class (HR 2.181, 95% CI: 1.224–3.886). Among 8 composite inflammatory indices evaluated, three demonstrated significant associations with MACEs: the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index (per unit increase in Z-score, HR 0.402, 95% CI: 0.230–0.703), neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR) index (per unit increase in Z-score, HR 1.234, 95% CI: 1.002–1.522), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) index (Z-score > 0, HR 1.635, 95% CI: 1.007–2.655). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in MACE-free survival across the three classes (log-rank p = 0.001), with CALLY, NAR, and AISI also showing significant prognostic discrimination. Component analysis revealed the high-inflammation phenotype was independently associated with a 2.44-fold increased risk of hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure (HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.230–4.846), accounting for 60.67% of total MACEs. These findings were consistently reproduced in a sensitivity analysis restricted to patients without a history of myocardial infarction.

Conclusion

Inflammatory and clinical phenotyping identifies distinct risk subgroups in NOCAD. While the high-inflammation phenotype is associated with the highest overall MACEs risk, this prognostic signal is predominantly driven by hospitalizations for unstable angina or heart failure. These findings suggest that inflammation-based phenotyping could serve as an exploratory complementary tool for risk stratification, requiring further external validation before any routine clinical application.