Scholarlink

Background <p>The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) reflects the interplay between systemic inflammation and nutritional status, and has recently been proposed as a prognostic biomarker in heart failure (HF). However, its association with mortality risk across acute decompensated HF (ADHF) and chronic HF (CHF) populations remains uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluated the relationship between baseline CAR and all-cause mortality in HF.</p> Methods <p>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched for relevant longitudinal studies. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using a random-effects model accounting for heterogeneity. Prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of study characteristics.</p> Results <p>Twelve cohort studies involving 6,377 patients were included. High CAR was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality (RR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.86–2.93), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 66%). Notably, the association was weaker in prospective studies (RR = 1.45) compared with retrospective studies (RR = 2.50). Subgroup findings were consistent across regions (Asian: RR = 2.62; Western: RR = 1.87), HF phenotype (ADHF: RR = 2.15; CHF: RR = 2.47), age (&lt; 65 years: RR = 2.36; ≥65 years: RR = 2.33), CAR cutoff (&lt; 0.5&#xa0;mg/g: RR = 2.60; ≥0.5&#xa0;mg/g: RR = 2.16), follow-up duration (&lt; 30 months: RR = 2.20; ≥30 months: RR = 2.45), and analytic model (univariate: RR = 2.71; multivariate: RR = 1.99). Meta-regression identified no significant moderators.</p> Conclusions <p>Elevated baseline CAR is consistently associated with higher mortality risk in patients with HF. However, the strength of this association appears lower in prospective studies, suggesting that the overall pooled estimate may be influenced by biases inherent to retrospective designs. In addition, the clinical utility of CAR for risk stratification of patients with HF requires further validation in well-designed prospective studies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and the mortality of patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月29日

查看全文
  • Yan Wang,
  • Zhenfei Yuan

摘要

Background

The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) reflects the interplay between systemic inflammation and nutritional status, and has recently been proposed as a prognostic biomarker in heart failure (HF). However, its association with mortality risk across acute decompensated HF (ADHF) and chronic HF (CHF) populations remains uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluated the relationship between baseline CAR and all-cause mortality in HF.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched for relevant longitudinal studies. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using a random-effects model accounting for heterogeneity. Prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of study characteristics.

Results

Twelve cohort studies involving 6,377 patients were included. High CAR was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality (RR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.86–2.93), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 66%). Notably, the association was weaker in prospective studies (RR = 1.45) compared with retrospective studies (RR = 2.50). Subgroup findings were consistent across regions (Asian: RR = 2.62; Western: RR = 1.87), HF phenotype (ADHF: RR = 2.15; CHF: RR = 2.47), age (< 65 years: RR = 2.36; ≥65 years: RR = 2.33), CAR cutoff (< 0.5 mg/g: RR = 2.60; ≥0.5 mg/g: RR = 2.16), follow-up duration (< 30 months: RR = 2.20; ≥30 months: RR = 2.45), and analytic model (univariate: RR = 2.71; multivariate: RR = 1.99). Meta-regression identified no significant moderators.

Conclusions

Elevated baseline CAR is consistently associated with higher mortality risk in patients with HF. However, the strength of this association appears lower in prospective studies, suggesting that the overall pooled estimate may be influenced by biases inherent to retrospective designs. In addition, the clinical utility of CAR for risk stratification of patients with HF requires further validation in well-designed prospective studies.