Scholarlink

Background <p>Numerous studies have shown that exercise and dietary interventions positively impact CVD outcomes; however, there is substantial variability in the efficacy of different interventions. The absence of direct comparisons between multiple interventions complicates the determination of their relative effects. This study aims to synthesize the literature on the impacts of exercise, dietary, and combined interventions on cardiovascular health indicators, and to perform a network meta-analysis to rank the efficacy of these approaches, providing a theoretical foundation for selecting optimal intervention strategies.</p> Methods <p>We systematically reviewed the literature from database inception through September 2024, searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data were aggregated and analyzed using network meta-analysis, with intervention efficacy ranked according to Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) curves.</p> Results <p>The efficacy of these interventions was ranked as follows: 1). Triglycerides (TG) Reduction: CR + EX &gt; CR &gt; 5/2F + EX &gt; TRF + EX &gt; KD &gt; 5/2F &gt; KD + EX &gt; EX &gt; CON &gt; TRF. 2). Total Cholesterol (TC) Reduction: CR + EX &gt; CR &gt; 5/2F + EX &gt; 5/2F &gt; TRF + EX &gt; EX &gt; CON &gt; KD &gt; TRF &gt; KD + EX. 3). High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Increase: 5/2F &gt; KD &gt; KD + EX &gt; TRF + EX &gt; CON &gt; EX &gt; TRF &gt; 5/2F + EX &gt; CR + EX &gt; CR. 4). Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Reduction: CR + EX &gt; CR &gt; TRF + EX &gt; KD + EX &gt; EX &gt; KD &gt; 5/2F &gt; CON &gt; 5/2F + EX &gt; TRF. 5). Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Reduction: 5/2F &gt; CR + EX &gt; CR &gt; EX &gt; TRF &gt; TRF + EX &gt; CON &gt; 5/2F + EX. 6). Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Reduction: CR &gt; CR + EX &gt; TRF &gt; 5/2F &gt; TRF + EX &gt; EX &gt; CON &gt; 5/2F + EX.</p> Conclusion <p>CR and CR + EX demonstrated the most positive effects on cardiovascular health indicators. In contrast, 5/2F + EX ranked relatively low in effectiveness, with its impact on several indicators being even lower than that of CON.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effects of exercise combined with different dietary interventions on cardiovascular health a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月26日

查看全文
  • Yang Hei,
  • Yongchao Xie

摘要

Background

Numerous studies have shown that exercise and dietary interventions positively impact CVD outcomes; however, there is substantial variability in the efficacy of different interventions. The absence of direct comparisons between multiple interventions complicates the determination of their relative effects. This study aims to synthesize the literature on the impacts of exercise, dietary, and combined interventions on cardiovascular health indicators, and to perform a network meta-analysis to rank the efficacy of these approaches, providing a theoretical foundation for selecting optimal intervention strategies.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature from database inception through September 2024, searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data were aggregated and analyzed using network meta-analysis, with intervention efficacy ranked according to Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) curves.

Results

The efficacy of these interventions was ranked as follows: 1). Triglycerides (TG) Reduction: CR + EX > CR > 5/2F + EX > TRF + EX > KD > 5/2F > KD + EX > EX > CON > TRF. 2). Total Cholesterol (TC) Reduction: CR + EX > CR > 5/2F + EX > 5/2F > TRF + EX > EX > CON > KD > TRF > KD + EX. 3). High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Increase: 5/2F > KD > KD + EX > TRF + EX > CON > EX > TRF > 5/2F + EX > CR + EX > CR. 4). Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Reduction: CR + EX > CR > TRF + EX > KD + EX > EX > KD > 5/2F > CON > 5/2F + EX > TRF. 5). Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Reduction: 5/2F > CR + EX > CR > EX > TRF > TRF + EX > CON > 5/2F + EX. 6). Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Reduction: CR > CR + EX > TRF > 5/2F > TRF + EX > EX > CON > 5/2F + EX.

Conclusion

CR and CR + EX demonstrated the most positive effects on cardiovascular health indicators. In contrast, 5/2F + EX ranked relatively low in effectiveness, with its impact on several indicators being even lower than that of CON.