Scholarlink

Background <p>Laryngeal masks (LMA) are significant in airway management. The newly developed video LMA (SaCoVLM™) allows direct visualization. In our study, we sought to compare the success of intubation between the SaCoVLM™ and the Fastrack LMA using fiberoptic bronchoscopy guidance. Our primary objective was total intubation time, while our secondary objective was postoperative complications.</p> Methods <p>Patients (101) intubated with the SaCoVLM™ were categorized as Group V, while those intubated with the Fastrach LMA were categorized as Group F. LMA placement time, intubation time, total intubation time, and postoperative complications within the first 24&#xa0;h were followed.</p> Results <p>We found a shorter total intubation time with the SaCoVLM™. Moreover, patients in the Fastrack LMA experienced a higher incidence of sore throat and a greater frequency of blood-stained supraglottic airway devices (SADs). (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p> Conclusions <p>We found that the SaCoVLM™ is an effective alternative to the Fastrack LMA in terms of LMA placement success and intubation success.</p> Trial registration <p>NCT06121895.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of sacovlm™ video laryngeal mask-guided intubation and fastrach combined with flexible bronchoscopy-guided intubation -a prospective study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月1日

查看全文
  • Yusuf Ozguner,
  • Umut Can Özağar,
  • Seyyid Furkan Kına,
  • Atakan Sezgi,
  • Savaş Altınsoy,
  • Julide Ergil

摘要

Background

Laryngeal masks (LMA) are significant in airway management. The newly developed video LMA (SaCoVLM™) allows direct visualization. In our study, we sought to compare the success of intubation between the SaCoVLM™ and the Fastrack LMA using fiberoptic bronchoscopy guidance. Our primary objective was total intubation time, while our secondary objective was postoperative complications.

Methods

Patients (101) intubated with the SaCoVLM™ were categorized as Group V, while those intubated with the Fastrach LMA were categorized as Group F. LMA placement time, intubation time, total intubation time, and postoperative complications within the first 24 h were followed.

Results

We found a shorter total intubation time with the SaCoVLM™. Moreover, patients in the Fastrack LMA experienced a higher incidence of sore throat and a greater frequency of blood-stained supraglottic airway devices (SADs). (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

We found that the SaCoVLM™ is an effective alternative to the Fastrack LMA in terms of LMA placement success and intubation success.

Trial registration

NCT06121895.