Backgroud <p><i>Sophora</i> L. is a medicinally significant genus within Papilionoideae (Fabaceae), renowned for its medicinal, ecological, and economic importance. However, taxonomic and phylogenetic uncertainties persist within this genus, especially in China, due to limited genetic data and the lack of effective molecular markers. This study aimed to address these limitations by sequencing and analyzing chloroplast (cp.) genomes from six <i>Sophora</i> species endemic to China, thereby enriching genetic resources for future research.</p> Result <p>Here, we reported and characterized six chloroplast (cp.) genomes of <i>Sophora</i> species (<i>Sophora xanthantha</i>, <i>Sophora davidii</i>, <i>Sophora moocroftiana</i>, <i>Sophora tonkinensis</i>, <i>Sophora velutina</i>, and <i>Sophora velutina</i> var. <i>cavaleriei</i>) from China, sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform. Comparative analyses of these newly generated cp. genomes, alongside previously published <i>Sophora</i> cp. genomes, revealed that the <i>Sophora</i> cp. genomes exhibited a size range of 151,270 − 154,378&#xa0;bp (excluding <i>S. japonica</i> and <i>S. xanthantha</i>). We observed expansions of the inverted repeat (IR) regions in <i>Sophora</i>, leading to the translocation of <i>rpl</i>2 into the large single-copy (LSC) region, pseudogenization of <i>ycf</i>1, and absence of <i>trn</i>H in some species. Comparative genome analysis revealed a ~ 24-kb inversion between <i>trn</i>C-GCA and <i>trn</i>F-GAA within the genus, a phenomenon first observed to involve at least three rearrangements. Furthermore, we identified three valuable molecular markers (<i>trn</i>T<i>-</i>UGU <i>- trn</i>L<i>-</i>UAA, <i>psb</i>E <i>- pet</i>L, and <i>rps</i>11 <i>- rpl</i>36) that are suitable for phylogenetic inference within <i>Sophora</i>.</p> Conclusions <p>Phylogenetic analyses based on the chloroplast genomes robustly supported the monophyly of sect. <i>Pseudosophora</i>. Importantly, our phylogenetic results suggested that <i>S. japonica</i> and <i>S. xanthantha</i> should not be classified within the genus <i>Sophora</i>. These findings contribute significantly to the chloroplast genomic data of <i>Sophora</i> and provide valuable genetic resources and molecular markers for resolving taxonomic ambiguities and advancing future phylogenetic, evolutionary, and taxonomic investigations of <i>Sophora</i>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparative chloroplast genomes of Sophora species: identification of variable DNA markers and phylogenetic relationships within the genus

  • Na Duan,
  • Dafu Ru,
  • Bingbing Liu

摘要

Backgroud

Sophora L. is a medicinally significant genus within Papilionoideae (Fabaceae), renowned for its medicinal, ecological, and economic importance. However, taxonomic and phylogenetic uncertainties persist within this genus, especially in China, due to limited genetic data and the lack of effective molecular markers. This study aimed to address these limitations by sequencing and analyzing chloroplast (cp.) genomes from six Sophora species endemic to China, thereby enriching genetic resources for future research.

Result

Here, we reported and characterized six chloroplast (cp.) genomes of Sophora species (Sophora xanthantha, Sophora davidii, Sophora moocroftiana, Sophora tonkinensis, Sophora velutina, and Sophora velutina var. cavaleriei) from China, sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform. Comparative analyses of these newly generated cp. genomes, alongside previously published Sophora cp. genomes, revealed that the Sophora cp. genomes exhibited a size range of 151,270 − 154,378 bp (excluding S. japonica and S. xanthantha). We observed expansions of the inverted repeat (IR) regions in Sophora, leading to the translocation of rpl2 into the large single-copy (LSC) region, pseudogenization of ycf1, and absence of trnH in some species. Comparative genome analysis revealed a ~ 24-kb inversion between trnC-GCA and trnF-GAA within the genus, a phenomenon first observed to involve at least three rearrangements. Furthermore, we identified three valuable molecular markers (trnT-UGU - trnL-UAA, psbE - petL, and rps11 - rpl36) that are suitable for phylogenetic inference within Sophora.

Conclusions

Phylogenetic analyses based on the chloroplast genomes robustly supported the monophyly of sect. Pseudosophora. Importantly, our phylogenetic results suggested that S. japonica and S. xanthantha should not be classified within the genus Sophora. These findings contribute significantly to the chloroplast genomic data of Sophora and provide valuable genetic resources and molecular markers for resolving taxonomic ambiguities and advancing future phylogenetic, evolutionary, and taxonomic investigations of Sophora.