Scholarlink

Background <p>Animal gastrointestinal tracts generally evolved towards a diverse and spatially structured organ system for efficient food digestion. In it, food is chemically broken down and bacterial load reduced by gastric acid in the stomach, acting as a “gatekeeper” for microbes entering the intestines where chyme nutrients and water are absorbed. The natural microbiota across gastrointestinal tract zones support digestion, compete with ingested pathogens and acts itself as an immune stimulus. Despite its important role, several lineages of fish, such as pipefishes, have secondarily lost their stomach and evolved agastric digestion, with unknown consequences to their intestines’ microbiomes.</p> Results <p>Here, we test how stomach loss might affect the microbiome by investigating the fore-, mid- and hindgut’s autochthonous microbiota of the Baltic Sea broadnosed pipefish, <i>Syngnathus typhle</i>, and comparing it to the stomach, fore- and hindgut’s autochthonous microbiota of the sympatric and ecologically similar three-spine stickleback, <i>Gasterosteus aculeatus</i>. Using 16S-rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR, we show that microbial abundance is high in the stomach, accompanied by high alpha diversity, but low in the intestine of <i>G. aculeatus</i>, although microbial diversity remains at intermediate levels – a pattern almost inversed in <i>S. typhle</i>. <i>G. aculeatus</i>’ stomach has the most distinct microbiota across gastrointestinal zones; however, this species’ intestines’ microbes are also found in <i>S. typhle</i>. In contrast, the pipefish’s hindgut is the most distinct zone, and many microbes shared across its whole intestine are not found in the <i>G. aculeatus</i>.</p> Conclusions <p>Our data supports the notion of the stomach and its distinct microbiome being an immunological gatekeeper for the gut, but also suggests that <i>S. typhle</i> might benefit from the additional microbes as many indicator taxa are suspected to act as mutualistic symbionts. Stomach-loss may therefore be a trade-off between improved chemical digestion capabilities and an immunological gate-keeper vs. improved microbial digestion and increased immune stimulation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Gastrointestinal microbiota of sympatric pipefish (Syngnathus typhle) and stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) indicate trade-off associated with evolutionary stomach loss

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月30日

查看全文
  • Ralf F. Schneider,
  • Jule Peter,
  • Nils Newrzella,
  • Silke-Mareike Marten,
  • Isabel Tanger,
  • Olivia Roth

摘要

Background

Animal gastrointestinal tracts generally evolved towards a diverse and spatially structured organ system for efficient food digestion. In it, food is chemically broken down and bacterial load reduced by gastric acid in the stomach, acting as a “gatekeeper” for microbes entering the intestines where chyme nutrients and water are absorbed. The natural microbiota across gastrointestinal tract zones support digestion, compete with ingested pathogens and acts itself as an immune stimulus. Despite its important role, several lineages of fish, such as pipefishes, have secondarily lost their stomach and evolved agastric digestion, with unknown consequences to their intestines’ microbiomes.

Results

Here, we test how stomach loss might affect the microbiome by investigating the fore-, mid- and hindgut’s autochthonous microbiota of the Baltic Sea broadnosed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle, and comparing it to the stomach, fore- and hindgut’s autochthonous microbiota of the sympatric and ecologically similar three-spine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Using 16S-rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR, we show that microbial abundance is high in the stomach, accompanied by high alpha diversity, but low in the intestine of G. aculeatus, although microbial diversity remains at intermediate levels – a pattern almost inversed in S. typhle. G. aculeatus’ stomach has the most distinct microbiota across gastrointestinal zones; however, this species’ intestines’ microbes are also found in S. typhle. In contrast, the pipefish’s hindgut is the most distinct zone, and many microbes shared across its whole intestine are not found in the G. aculeatus.

Conclusions

Our data supports the notion of the stomach and its distinct microbiome being an immunological gatekeeper for the gut, but also suggests that S. typhle might benefit from the additional microbes as many indicator taxa are suspected to act as mutualistic symbionts. Stomach-loss may therefore be a trade-off between improved chemical digestion capabilities and an immunological gate-keeper vs. improved microbial digestion and increased immune stimulation.