Background <p>Environments shape adaptive trajectories of populations, often leading to adaptive parallelism in identical, and divergence in different environments. However, how does the likelihood of these possibilities change with minute changes in the environment remain unclear.</p> Results <p>In this study, we evolved <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> in environments which differed only in the manner in which the sugar source is presented to the population. In one set of populations, carbon was presented as a mixture of glucose-galactose, and in the other, as melibiose, a glucose-galactose disaccharide. Since the two environments differed in how the two monosaccharides are packaged, we call these environments ‘synonymous’. Our results show that even subtle environmental differences can lead to differing phenotypic responses between the two sets of evolved populations. However, despite different adaptive responses, pleiotropic effects of adaptation are largely predictable. We also show that distinct genomic targets of adaptation between the two sets of evolved populations are functionally convergent.</p> Conclusion <p>This study highlights how subtle environmental differences dictate phenotypic and genetic adaptation of populations. Additionally, these results also suggest the predictive potential of ancestor’s fitness in understanding pleiotropic responses. Our work underscores the importance of studying more such environments to understand the generality of adaptive responses in populations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Resource presentation dictates genetic and phenotypic adaptation in yeast

  • Neetika Ahlawat,
  • Anjali Mahilkar,
  • Supreet Saini

摘要

Background

Environments shape adaptive trajectories of populations, often leading to adaptive parallelism in identical, and divergence in different environments. However, how does the likelihood of these possibilities change with minute changes in the environment remain unclear.

Results

In this study, we evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae in environments which differed only in the manner in which the sugar source is presented to the population. In one set of populations, carbon was presented as a mixture of glucose-galactose, and in the other, as melibiose, a glucose-galactose disaccharide. Since the two environments differed in how the two monosaccharides are packaged, we call these environments ‘synonymous’. Our results show that even subtle environmental differences can lead to differing phenotypic responses between the two sets of evolved populations. However, despite different adaptive responses, pleiotropic effects of adaptation are largely predictable. We also show that distinct genomic targets of adaptation between the two sets of evolved populations are functionally convergent.

Conclusion

This study highlights how subtle environmental differences dictate phenotypic and genetic adaptation of populations. Additionally, these results also suggest the predictive potential of ancestor’s fitness in understanding pleiotropic responses. Our work underscores the importance of studying more such environments to understand the generality of adaptive responses in populations.