Background <p>Imaging-based spatial transcriptomics technologies allow us to explore spatial gene expression profiles at the cellular level. Cell type annotation of imaging-based spatial data is challenging due to the small gene panel, but it is a crucial step for downstream analyses. Many good reference-based cell type annotation tools have been developed for single-cell RNA sequencing and sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics data. However, the performance of the reference-based cell type annotation tools on imaging-based spatial transcriptomics data has not been well studied yet.</p> Results <p>We compared performance of five reference-based methods (<i>SingleR</i>, <i>Azimuth</i>, <i>RCTD</i>, <i>scPred</i> and <i>scmapCell</i>) with the marker-gene-based manual annotation method on an imaging-based Xenium data of human breast cancer. A practical workflow has been demonstrated for preparing a high-quality single-cell RNA reference, evaluating the accuracy, and estimating the running time for reference-based cell type annotation tools.</p> Conclusions <p><i>SingleR</i> was the best performing reference-based cell type annotation tool for the Xenium platform, being fast, accurate and easy to use, with results closely matching those of manual annotation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Benchmarking cell type annotation methods for 10x Xenium spatial transcriptomics data

  • Jinming Cheng,
  • Xinyi Jin,
  • Gordon K. Smyth,
  • Yunshun Chen

摘要

Background

Imaging-based spatial transcriptomics technologies allow us to explore spatial gene expression profiles at the cellular level. Cell type annotation of imaging-based spatial data is challenging due to the small gene panel, but it is a crucial step for downstream analyses. Many good reference-based cell type annotation tools have been developed for single-cell RNA sequencing and sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics data. However, the performance of the reference-based cell type annotation tools on imaging-based spatial transcriptomics data has not been well studied yet.

Results

We compared performance of five reference-based methods (SingleR, Azimuth, RCTD, scPred and scmapCell) with the marker-gene-based manual annotation method on an imaging-based Xenium data of human breast cancer. A practical workflow has been demonstrated for preparing a high-quality single-cell RNA reference, evaluating the accuracy, and estimating the running time for reference-based cell type annotation tools.

Conclusions

SingleR was the best performing reference-based cell type annotation tool for the Xenium platform, being fast, accurate and easy to use, with results closely matching those of manual annotation.