Scholarlink

<p>Labour turnover is a crucial element of contemporary economic life of firms. It can improve productivity if more productive workers replace less productive ones. However, in the short run, it generates sizeable labour adjustment costs (LACs), including productivity losses for firms. This paper sheds new light on the turnover-productivity relationship focusing on productivity LACs. We use firm-level 2014–2022 Belgian data with information on stayers, new hires and leavers: those who are fired, those leaving voluntarily, and those who are about to retire. We use the Hellerstein-Neumark (HN) framework to quantify the productivity of these different labour types, using stayers as a benchmark. We posit that evidence of significant productivity handicaps is a good indicator of productivity LACs. Results suggest no productivity LACs for new hires. By contrast, for leavers, they point to significant ones. What is more, findings for prospective (early) retirees indicate a very sizeable drop in productivity during their last year of employment.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Productivity labour adjustment costs. How do new hires and leavers (Incl. retirees) compare?

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月24日

查看全文
  • Vincent Vandenberghe

摘要

Labour turnover is a crucial element of contemporary economic life of firms. It can improve productivity if more productive workers replace less productive ones. However, in the short run, it generates sizeable labour adjustment costs (LACs), including productivity losses for firms. This paper sheds new light on the turnover-productivity relationship focusing on productivity LACs. We use firm-level 2014–2022 Belgian data with information on stayers, new hires and leavers: those who are fired, those leaving voluntarily, and those who are about to retire. We use the Hellerstein-Neumark (HN) framework to quantify the productivity of these different labour types, using stayers as a benchmark. We posit that evidence of significant productivity handicaps is a good indicator of productivity LACs. Results suggest no productivity LACs for new hires. By contrast, for leavers, they point to significant ones. What is more, findings for prospective (early) retirees indicate a very sizeable drop in productivity during their last year of employment.