Scholarlink

Background <p>Traditional variable-centred approaches often analyse physical behaviours (sedentary behaviour [SB], light physical activity [LPA], and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]) in isolation, potentially masking their combined effects on outcomes. This study applied latent profile analysis, a person-centred approach, to identify naturally occurring physical behaviour profiles in older adults and examined their associations with physical fitness and physical function.</p> Methods <p>This cross-sectional study included 1,095 older Portuguese adults (≥ 65 years; 765 females). SB, LPA, and MVPA were assessed using accelerometry (Actigraph; Pensacola, Florida) on the right hip and expressed as percentages of waking time. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct profiles based on these percentages. Physical fitness was evaluated by Senior Fitness Test battery and handgrip strength. Physical function was assessed using the 12-item Composite Physical Function questionnaire. Generalised linear models, adjusted for age, were used to examine associations between profiles and outcomes.</p> Results <p>Three distinct profiles emerged for both sexes: “balanced movers” (~ 50% SB, ~ 46% LPA, ~ 4% MVPA), “intermediate movers” (~ 66% SB, ~ 32% LPA, ~ 2% MVPA), and “highly sedentary” (~ 80% SB, ~ 20% LPA, &lt; 1% MVPA). Compared to the “highly sedentary” groups, both “balanced movers” and “intermediate movers” demonstrated better performance on most physical fitness tests and reported higher physical function. Notably, “intermediate movers”, performed similarly to “balanced movers” in most measures.</p> Conclusions <p>Distinct physical behaviour profiles exist among older Portuguese adults. Profiles characterised by lower SB and higher LPA, even when not fully meeting MVPA recommendations (“intermediate movers”), were associated with better physical fitness and physical function compared to the “highly sedentary” profile. This underscores the importance of reducing SB and promoting LPA along with MVPA. By uncovering these behavioural profiles among older adults, latent profile analysis provides valuable insights to guide the development of more personalized interventions for healthy ageing.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Physical behaviour profiles and their associations with fitness and function in older adults: a cross-sectional latent profile analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月12日

查看全文
  • Vera Zymbal,
  • João P. Magalhães,
  • Fátima Baptista,
  • Gil B. Rosa,
  • Eduardo B. Cruz,
  • Luís B. Sardinha

摘要

Background

Traditional variable-centred approaches often analyse physical behaviours (sedentary behaviour [SB], light physical activity [LPA], and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]) in isolation, potentially masking their combined effects on outcomes. This study applied latent profile analysis, a person-centred approach, to identify naturally occurring physical behaviour profiles in older adults and examined their associations with physical fitness and physical function.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 1,095 older Portuguese adults (≥ 65 years; 765 females). SB, LPA, and MVPA were assessed using accelerometry (Actigraph; Pensacola, Florida) on the right hip and expressed as percentages of waking time. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct profiles based on these percentages. Physical fitness was evaluated by Senior Fitness Test battery and handgrip strength. Physical function was assessed using the 12-item Composite Physical Function questionnaire. Generalised linear models, adjusted for age, were used to examine associations between profiles and outcomes.

Results

Three distinct profiles emerged for both sexes: “balanced movers” (~ 50% SB, ~ 46% LPA, ~ 4% MVPA), “intermediate movers” (~ 66% SB, ~ 32% LPA, ~ 2% MVPA), and “highly sedentary” (~ 80% SB, ~ 20% LPA, < 1% MVPA). Compared to the “highly sedentary” groups, both “balanced movers” and “intermediate movers” demonstrated better performance on most physical fitness tests and reported higher physical function. Notably, “intermediate movers”, performed similarly to “balanced movers” in most measures.

Conclusions

Distinct physical behaviour profiles exist among older Portuguese adults. Profiles characterised by lower SB and higher LPA, even when not fully meeting MVPA recommendations (“intermediate movers”), were associated with better physical fitness and physical function compared to the “highly sedentary” profile. This underscores the importance of reducing SB and promoting LPA along with MVPA. By uncovering these behavioural profiles among older adults, latent profile analysis provides valuable insights to guide the development of more personalized interventions for healthy ageing.