Abstract <p>As demonstrated in Hayman’s proof of the classical Borel lemma, every continuous increasing function <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T(r)\geq 1\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m1--> </InlineEquation> satisfies <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T\big{(}r+\frac{1}{T(r)}\big{)}&lt;2T(r)\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m2--> </InlineEquation> outside a possible exceptional set of linear measure <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m3--> </InlineEquation>. In this work, we prove that <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T(r)\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m4--> </InlineEquation> satisfies <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T\big{(}r+\frac{1}{T(r)}\big{)}&lt;\big{(}\sqrt{T(r)}+1\big{)}^{2}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m5--> </InlineEquation> outside a possible exceptional set of linear measure <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\zeta(2)=\frac{\pi^{2}}{6}&lt;2\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m6--> </InlineEquation> for the Riemann zeta function <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\zeta(s)\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m7--> </InlineEquation>, which is sharper if <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T(r)\geq\big{(}\sqrt{2}+1\big{)}^{2}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m8--> </InlineEquation>. Observe <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(T\big{(}r+\frac{1}{T(r)}\big{)}&lt;\big{(}\sqrt{T(r)}+1\big{)}^{2}\leq 2T(r)\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m9--> </InlineEquation> outside a possible exceptional set of linear measure <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\zeta\big{(}2,\sqrt{2}+1\big{)}\leq 0.52&lt;2\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m10--> </InlineEquation> for the Hurwitz zeta function <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\zeta(s,a)\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m11--> </InlineEquation>. This is noteworthy, provided the set of <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(r\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m12--> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1\leq T(r)&lt;\big{(}\sqrt{2}+1\big{)}^{2}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m13--> </InlineEquation> has linear measure less than <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1.48\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560550Han-m14--> </InlineEquation>. Focusing solely on meromorphic functions of infinite order, we apply Hinkkanen’s refined version of the second main theorem, draw comparisons with the classical results of Borel, Nevanlinna, and Hayman, and finally extend an earlier work of Fernández Árias.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Borel’s Lemma: Geometric Progressions and the Riemann and Hurwitz Zeta Functions

  • Qi Han,
  • Jingbo Liu,
  • Nadeem Malik

摘要

Abstract

As demonstrated in Hayman’s proof of the classical Borel lemma, every continuous increasing function \(T(r)\geq 1\) satisfies \(T\big{(}r+\frac{1}{T(r)}\big{)}<2T(r)\) outside a possible exceptional set of linear measure \(2\) . In this work, we prove that \(T(r)\) satisfies \(T\big{(}r+\frac{1}{T(r)}\big{)}<\big{(}\sqrt{T(r)}+1\big{)}^{2}\) outside a possible exceptional set of linear measure \(\zeta(2)=\frac{\pi^{2}}{6}<2\) for the Riemann zeta function \(\zeta(s)\) , which is sharper if \(T(r)\geq\big{(}\sqrt{2}+1\big{)}^{2}\) . Observe \(T\big{(}r+\frac{1}{T(r)}\big{)}<\big{(}\sqrt{T(r)}+1\big{)}^{2}\leq 2T(r)\) outside a possible exceptional set of linear measure \(\zeta\big{(}2,\sqrt{2}+1\big{)}\leq 0.52<2\) for the Hurwitz zeta function \(\zeta(s,a)\) . This is noteworthy, provided the set of \(r\) with \(1\leq T(r)<\big{(}\sqrt{2}+1\big{)}^{2}\) has linear measure less than \(1.48\) . Focusing solely on meromorphic functions of infinite order, we apply Hinkkanen’s refined version of the second main theorem, draw comparisons with the classical results of Borel, Nevanlinna, and Hayman, and finally extend an earlier work of Fernández Árias.