Abstract <p>We refined the axiomatics of asymmetric logics. For logics <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="70" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(X(km,k)\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m1--> </InlineEquation> of family subsets of the <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="28" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(km\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m2--> </InlineEquation>-element set <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(X\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m3--> </InlineEquation>, which cardinal numbers are multiples of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m4--> </InlineEquation> we completely described the cases in which <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="70" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(X(km,k)\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m5--> </InlineEquation> a) is symmetric or b) is asymmetric. For an infinite set <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m6--> </InlineEquation> and a natural number <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\geq 2\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m7--> </InlineEquation> we constructed the concrete logics <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="21" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{E}^{n}_{\Omega}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m8--> </InlineEquation> and completely described the cases in which these logics are asymmetric. For asymmetric logics <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{E}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m9--> </InlineEquation> we determine when both the set <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A\in\mathcal{E}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m10--> </InlineEquation> and its complement <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="21" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A^{c}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m11--> </InlineEquation> are atoms of the logic <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{E}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m12--> </InlineEquation>. Let a symmetric logic <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{E}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m13--> </InlineEquation> of a finite set <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m14--> </InlineEquation> be not a Boolean algebra, and let <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq15.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{A}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m15--> </InlineEquation> be an algebra of subsets from <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m16--> </InlineEquation>, and assume that <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq17.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="52" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{E}\subset\mathcal{A}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m17--> </InlineEquation>. Then there exists a measure on <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{E}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m18--> </InlineEquation>, that does not admit an extension to a measure on <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="12202_2025_8231_Article_IEq15.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{A}\)</EquationSource> <!--LobJMat2560525Bikchentaev-m19--> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On Axiomatics of Symmetric and Asymmetric Concrete Logics

  • A. M. Bikchentaev,
  • Khattab Fawwaz,
  • Muntadher Mohamed Ali

摘要

Abstract

We refined the axiomatics of asymmetric logics. For logics \(X(km,k)\) of family subsets of the \(km\) -element set \(X\) , which cardinal numbers are multiples of \(k\) we completely described the cases in which \(X(km,k)\) a) is symmetric or b) is asymmetric. For an infinite set \(\Omega\) and a natural number \(n\geq 2\) we constructed the concrete logics \(\mathcal{E}^{n}_{\Omega}\) and completely described the cases in which these logics are asymmetric. For asymmetric logics \(\mathcal{E}\) we determine when both the set \(A\in\mathcal{E}\) and its complement \(A^{c}\) are atoms of the logic \(\mathcal{E}\) . Let a symmetric logic \(\mathcal{E}\) of a finite set \(\Omega\) be not a Boolean algebra, and let \(\mathcal{A}\) be an algebra of subsets from \(\Omega\) , and assume that \(\mathcal{E}\subset\mathcal{A}\) . Then there exists a measure on \(\mathcal{E}\) , that does not admit an extension to a measure on \(\mathcal{A}\) .