Scholarlink

Abstract <p>A critical analysis of the use of the HVBK method to study three-dimensional, turbulent flows of superfluids is presented. The formalism incorporates mutual friction between the normal and superfluidity velocities due to quantum vortexes. The approach relies on the HVBK model, originally developed for He II rotation. It relates vortex line density to coarse-grain vorticity, using the well-known Feynman’s rule. Various justifications and results associated with the method are analyzed. Particular emphasis is placed on the so-called “vortex bundle” structure. The concept of vortex bundles forming quantum turbulence structure is controversial, and does not support the use of HVBK. The final conclusion is that HVBK seems highly counterproductive because it completely disregards the actual structure of vortex tangle as a chaotic cluster of vortex loops and prevents development of adequate theory.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

On the Hall–Vinen–Bekharevich–Khalatnikov Model in Superfluid Turbulence in He II

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月1日

查看全文
  • S. K. Nemirovskii

摘要

Abstract

A critical analysis of the use of the HVBK method to study three-dimensional, turbulent flows of superfluids is presented. The formalism incorporates mutual friction between the normal and superfluidity velocities due to quantum vortexes. The approach relies on the HVBK model, originally developed for He II rotation. It relates vortex line density to coarse-grain vorticity, using the well-known Feynman’s rule. Various justifications and results associated with the method are analyzed. Particular emphasis is placed on the so-called “vortex bundle” structure. The concept of vortex bundles forming quantum turbulence structure is controversial, and does not support the use of HVBK. The final conclusion is that HVBK seems highly counterproductive because it completely disregards the actual structure of vortex tangle as a chaotic cluster of vortex loops and prevents development of adequate theory.