Abstract <p>In this study, copper foam with varying filling rates (porosity of 95% and pore density of 20&#xa0;ppi) was combined with paraffin wax and integrated into a heat sink to investigate temperature fluctuations within the heat sink after charging and discharging of copper foam phase change materials (PCM) and an empty heat sink with varying filling rates. The study focused on three key PCMs: RT-42HC, RT-50HC, and RT-60HC. The PCMs had copper foam filling ratios of&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.18\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.37\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.55\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, with three heating loads (0.9&#xa0;kW/m<sup>2</sup>, 1.8&#xa0;kW/m<sup>2</sup>, and 2.7&#xa0;kW/m<sup>2</sup>). The data suggest that after 90&#xa0;minutes of charging, RT-42HC (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.37\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) can decrease the baseline temperature by 20.29% at 0.9&#xa0;kW/m<sup>2</sup>&#xa0;and a maximum of 35.49% with a foam filling ratio of&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.18\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Under a heating load of 2.7&#xa0;kW/m<sup>2</sup>, RT-50HC (<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.18\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) can reduce the baseline temperature by up to 35.49%. At the same load, RT-50HC (<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.18\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) can reduce the reference temperature by 32.45%.RT-42HC (<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.55\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) has a maximum enhancement ratio of 4.38 at SPT&#xa0;= 50° and a heating load of 18&#xa0;W, whereas RT-50HC (<InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.55\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) has a maximum enhancement ratio of 4.3 at SPT=60° and a load of 27&#xa0;W. In the cycle test with an 18&#xa0;W heating load, RT-42HC (<InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11823_2025_417_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\psi=0.37\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) had the most favorable influence, lowering the reference temperature by a maximum of 21.94%.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Study on the Effect of Equal Volume Filled Copper Foam on Radiator Temperature

  • Z. Zhang,
  • S. Q. Wang,
  • S. Mehendale,
  • J. J. Tian

摘要

Abstract

In this study, copper foam with varying filling rates (porosity of 95% and pore density of 20 ppi) was combined with paraffin wax and integrated into a heat sink to investigate temperature fluctuations within the heat sink after charging and discharging of copper foam phase change materials (PCM) and an empty heat sink with varying filling rates. The study focused on three key PCMs: RT-42HC, RT-50HC, and RT-60HC. The PCMs had copper foam filling ratios of  \(\psi=0.18\) , \(\psi=0.37\) , and  \(\psi=0.55\) , with three heating loads (0.9 kW/m2, 1.8 kW/m2, and 2.7 kW/m2). The data suggest that after 90 minutes of charging, RT-42HC ( \(\psi=0.37\) ) can decrease the baseline temperature by 20.29% at 0.9 kW/m2 and a maximum of 35.49% with a foam filling ratio of  \(\psi=0.18\) . Under a heating load of 2.7 kW/m2, RT-50HC ( \(\psi=0.18\) ) can reduce the baseline temperature by up to 35.49%. At the same load, RT-50HC ( \(\psi=0.18\) ) can reduce the reference temperature by 32.45%.RT-42HC ( \(\psi=0.55\) ) has a maximum enhancement ratio of 4.38 at SPT = 50° and a heating load of 18 W, whereas RT-50HC ( \(\psi=0.55\) ) has a maximum enhancement ratio of 4.3 at SPT=60° and a load of 27 W. In the cycle test with an 18 W heating load, RT-42HC ( \(\psi=0.37\) ) had the most favorable influence, lowering the reference temperature by a maximum of 21.94%.