Abstract <p>The permanent wilting point (θ<sub>PWP</sub>) is a crucial parameter in soil—plant—atmosphere research. The conventional θ<sub>PWP</sub>, corresponding to a soil matric potential of –1500 kPa, is determined by the pressure-plate method, which necessitates specialized equipment that is not always readily accessible. Many pedotransfer functions have been developed to estimate θ<sub>PWP</sub>, but they often face limitations due to soil type differences. This study aimed to construct a predictive model for θ<sub>PWP</sub> using three hygroscopic water contents (θ<sub>MRH</sub>, θ<sub>RH80</sub>, and θ<sub>RH50</sub>), which were measured at three relative humidity thresholds (98, 80, and 50%) and evaluate its performance. A new model for the dry—end section of the soil water retention curve (SWRC) was proposed as <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta = \left[ {1 - {{{\left( {\frac{{pF - p{{F}_{{{\text{MRH}}}}}}}{{p{{F}_{{{\text{RH50}}}}} - p{{F}_{{{\text{MRH}}}}}}}} \right)}}^{\beta }}} \right]\left( {{{\theta }_{{{\text{MRH}}}}} - {{\theta }_{{{\text{RH50}}}}}} \right) + {{\theta }_{{{\text{RH50}}}}}\)</EquationSource> <!--SoilSci2560319Chi-m1--> </InlineEquation>, and the hypothesis was that this model could be extended to estimate θ<sub>PWP</sub> while keeping the parameter β unchanged. Data from 30 soils were analyzed, and the new model was compared with two existing models: θ<sub>PWP</sub> = 1.5θ<sub>MRH</sub> and θ<sub>PWP</sub> = 3.0θ<sub>RH50</sub>. The results showed that the new model had a slope of 1.019, a coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) of 0.989, a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.010 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.007 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup> in the validation, outperforming the other two models. Compared with five relevant studies in the literature, the standardized root mean square error (SRMSE) of the new model was 0.01, indicating higher prediction accuracy. The proposed model demonstrates robust applicability to soils exhibiting either linear or nonlinear dry-end behavior in their SWRCs, providing a more accurate and versatile way to estimate θ<sub>PWP</sub>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Utilizing Hygroscopic Water Contents to Estimate Soil Water Content at Permanent Wilting Point

  • Chunming Chi,
  • Lili Yang,
  • Long Ma,
  • Cuili Zhang

摘要

Abstract

The permanent wilting point (θPWP) is a crucial parameter in soil—plant—atmosphere research. The conventional θPWP, corresponding to a soil matric potential of –1500 kPa, is determined by the pressure-plate method, which necessitates specialized equipment that is not always readily accessible. Many pedotransfer functions have been developed to estimate θPWP, but they often face limitations due to soil type differences. This study aimed to construct a predictive model for θPWP using three hygroscopic water contents (θMRH, θRH80, and θRH50), which were measured at three relative humidity thresholds (98, 80, and 50%) and evaluate its performance. A new model for the dry—end section of the soil water retention curve (SWRC) was proposed as \(\theta = \left[ {1 - {{{\left( {\frac{{pF - p{{F}_{{{\text{MRH}}}}}}}{{p{{F}_{{{\text{RH50}}}}} - p{{F}_{{{\text{MRH}}}}}}}} \right)}}^{\beta }}} \right]\left( {{{\theta }_{{{\text{MRH}}}}} - {{\theta }_{{{\text{RH50}}}}}} \right) + {{\theta }_{{{\text{RH50}}}}}\) , and the hypothesis was that this model could be extended to estimate θPWP while keeping the parameter β unchanged. Data from 30 soils were analyzed, and the new model was compared with two existing models: θPWP = 1.5θMRH and θPWP = 3.0θRH50. The results showed that the new model had a slope of 1.019, a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.989, a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.010 cm3 cm−3, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.007 cm3 cm−3 in the validation, outperforming the other two models. Compared with five relevant studies in the literature, the standardized root mean square error (SRMSE) of the new model was 0.01, indicating higher prediction accuracy. The proposed model demonstrates robust applicability to soils exhibiting either linear or nonlinear dry-end behavior in their SWRCs, providing a more accurate and versatile way to estimate θPWP.