错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Headspace-Solid phase Microextraction Methods for the Qualitative and Semi-Quantitative Determination of Aroma Compounds in Fruit-Based Spirits (Rakija) from Serbia

  • Jelena Stanojević,
  • Ivana Karabegović,
  • Bojana Danilović,
  • Jelena Zvezdanović,
  • Ljiljana Stanojević,
  • Dragan Cvetković

摘要

Abstract

The qualitative and semi-quantitative composition of aroma compounds in plum-, pear-, and quince-based spirits from Serbia was determined and mutually compared by liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with GC/MS analysis. Based on economic considerations, HS-SPME was suggested as the preferred method for the aroma analysis. The main volatile compounds in all three liquid-liquid extracts belonged to the group of alcohols (3-methyl-1-butanol and 2-methyl-1-butanol, as representatives) and esters (ethyl lactate, as the most abundant). 3-Methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, and ethyl lactate dominated in plum spirit; 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, isobutanol, ethyl lactate, and ethyl-(E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate—in pear spirit; and 3-methyl-1-butanol, isobutanol, ethyl lactate, and (E,E)-α-farnesene—in quince spirit. The main volatile compounds in all three HS-SPME extracts belonged to alcohols, esters, and terpenes. 3-Methyl-1-butanol, ethyl decanoate, and ethyl octanoate dominated in plum spirit; (E,E)-α-farnesene, 3-methyl-1-butanol, ethyl decanoate, and ethyl-(E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate—in pear spirit; and (E,E)-α-farnesene, 3-methyl-1-butanol, ethyl decanoate, and ethyl octanoate—in quince spirit.