Abstract <p>We address a possible development of a semiotic theory based on the principle of asymmetric dualism proposed by Sergei Karcevskij. We identify its differences from the Saussurean view of sign and demonstrate that, while Karcevskij adopts the principle of differentiation, he supplements it with a dynamic understanding of intrasystem relations. This makes it possible to construct multidimensional semiotic models describing how new meanings are generated due to the sign’s asymmetric dualism. We consider the semantics of linguistic sign as a structure in the state of dynamic equilibrium. Thus, we clarify Karcevskij’s concept of transposition, supplementing it with a concept of disposition (situation of the initial semiosis).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Semantics of Linguistic Sign in the Light of the Asymmetrical Dualism Theory: Possible Extensions

  • S. T. Zolyan

摘要

Abstract

We address a possible development of a semiotic theory based on the principle of asymmetric dualism proposed by Sergei Karcevskij. We identify its differences from the Saussurean view of sign and demonstrate that, while Karcevskij adopts the principle of differentiation, he supplements it with a dynamic understanding of intrasystem relations. This makes it possible to construct multidimensional semiotic models describing how new meanings are generated due to the sign’s asymmetric dualism. We consider the semantics of linguistic sign as a structure in the state of dynamic equilibrium. Thus, we clarify Karcevskij’s concept of transposition, supplementing it with a concept of disposition (situation of the initial semiosis).