Background <p>The occupational therapy intervention Balancing Everyday Life (BEL)<sup>TM</sup> aims to support mental health service users towards improved occupational balance and personal recovery. Yet, no research has specifically addressed recovery experiences among BEL<sup>TM</sup> participants.</p> Aim <p>To investigate how the recovery process was experienced by mental health services users who had participated in BEL<sup>TM</sup>.</p> Methods <p>The study was based on qualitative interviews with 11 participants. A deductive content analysis was performed based on the CHIME framework, a research-based tool for characterising the recovery process.</p> Results <p>All categories and most subcategories described in the CHIME framework could be found in the participants’ experiences. The most prominent categories were Sense of connectedness and Empowerment. Most subcategories were identified as well. Additionally, two subcategories not covered in CHIME were distinguished – occupational balance, and self-esteem and self-confidence – which may be specific to an occupational therapy intervention like BEL<sup>TM</sup>.</p> Conclusion <p>The study showed that CHIME was relevant for characterising the recovery process among BEL<sup>TM</sup> participants and identifying the features shaping that process. The findings support CHIME, while also indicating that BEL<sup>TM</sup> offers some additional avenues for personal recovery.</p> Significance <p>An occupational therapy intervention can support mental health service users towards personal recovery.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Recovery experiences among mental health service users going through the Balancing Everyday Life intervention – A deductive qualitative study

  • Mona Eklund,
  • Elisabeth Argentzell

摘要

Background

The occupational therapy intervention Balancing Everyday Life (BEL)TM aims to support mental health service users towards improved occupational balance and personal recovery. Yet, no research has specifically addressed recovery experiences among BELTM participants.

Aim

To investigate how the recovery process was experienced by mental health services users who had participated in BELTM.

Methods

The study was based on qualitative interviews with 11 participants. A deductive content analysis was performed based on the CHIME framework, a research-based tool for characterising the recovery process.

Results

All categories and most subcategories described in the CHIME framework could be found in the participants’ experiences. The most prominent categories were Sense of connectedness and Empowerment. Most subcategories were identified as well. Additionally, two subcategories not covered in CHIME were distinguished – occupational balance, and self-esteem and self-confidence – which may be specific to an occupational therapy intervention like BELTM.

Conclusion

The study showed that CHIME was relevant for characterising the recovery process among BELTM participants and identifying the features shaping that process. The findings support CHIME, while also indicating that BELTM offers some additional avenues for personal recovery.

Significance

An occupational therapy intervention can support mental health service users towards personal recovery.