Scholarlink

<p>While performance feedback is widely recognized as a trigger for search, there is limited understanding of how firms evaluate and prioritize specific strategic alternatives in response to performance deviations. To address this, we extend performance feedback theory by integrating the resource-based view (RBV) and attention-based view (ABV). We use RBV to categorize the strategic options into resource-seeking and market-seeking, and ABV to explicate the behavioral mechanism—specifically, shifts in temporal attention—that directs firms’ choices. We argue that performance feedback shifts managerial attention across time horizons: negative feedback triggers a focus on short-term recovery, driving firms toward developed economies for immediate resource upgrading; conversely, positive feedback shifts attention to long-term capability building, leading firms to avoid the imitation risks inherent in developing economies. Using data on Chinese firms’ OFDI, we find that deviation from profitability goals (both negative and positive) prompts firms to prioritize developed economies over developing ones, albeit through distinct attentional mechanisms. These effects are amplified in high-growth industries, where performance gaps are more likely to be attributed to internal resource deficits. Our study contributes to performance feedback theory by elucidating how attentional shifts shape the specific direction of firm strategic responses, and to international business literature by clarifying the behavioral mechanisms behind emerging market firms’ investment directions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Performance feedback and location choice: a study on Chinese Firms’ OFDI to developed and developing economies

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月11日

查看全文
  • Xin Chen,
  • Alex Junyi Fang

摘要

While performance feedback is widely recognized as a trigger for search, there is limited understanding of how firms evaluate and prioritize specific strategic alternatives in response to performance deviations. To address this, we extend performance feedback theory by integrating the resource-based view (RBV) and attention-based view (ABV). We use RBV to categorize the strategic options into resource-seeking and market-seeking, and ABV to explicate the behavioral mechanism—specifically, shifts in temporal attention—that directs firms’ choices. We argue that performance feedback shifts managerial attention across time horizons: negative feedback triggers a focus on short-term recovery, driving firms toward developed economies for immediate resource upgrading; conversely, positive feedback shifts attention to long-term capability building, leading firms to avoid the imitation risks inherent in developing economies. Using data on Chinese firms’ OFDI, we find that deviation from profitability goals (both negative and positive) prompts firms to prioritize developed economies over developing ones, albeit through distinct attentional mechanisms. These effects are amplified in high-growth industries, where performance gaps are more likely to be attributed to internal resource deficits. Our study contributes to performance feedback theory by elucidating how attentional shifts shape the specific direction of firm strategic responses, and to international business literature by clarifying the behavioral mechanisms behind emerging market firms’ investment directions.