Scholarlink

<p>This study presents a systematic analysis of ceramic art’s mediating role in Sino-European cultural exchanges, proposing a tripartite framework examining morphological divergence, chromatic symbolism, and decorative semiotics. Through archival research, museum collection analysis, and contemporary practice documentation, this investigation reveals how ceramic technologies and aesthetic philosophies have undergone dialectical transformation through intercultural contact. The research establishes three distinct phases of exchange: pre-modern trade-driven adaptation (7th–15th centuries), colonial-era technological transfer (16th–18th centuries), and contemporary globalized hybridization (19th–21st centuries). Particular emphasis is placed on technical knowledge transmission, contemporary artistic innovations, and the paradoxical relationship between cultural preservation and aesthetic convergence. The findings demonstrate that ceramic exchange has functioned as both a vehicle for cultural diplomacy and a catalyst for artistic innovation, generating hybrid aesthetic vocabularies that transcend traditional East-West binaries.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The collision and fusion of Eastern and Western aesthetic concepts: a study of ceramic art in cross-cultural exchange

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月24日

查看全文
  • Yibo He,
  • Lan Yao,
  • Yuanyuan Tian

摘要

This study presents a systematic analysis of ceramic art’s mediating role in Sino-European cultural exchanges, proposing a tripartite framework examining morphological divergence, chromatic symbolism, and decorative semiotics. Through archival research, museum collection analysis, and contemporary practice documentation, this investigation reveals how ceramic technologies and aesthetic philosophies have undergone dialectical transformation through intercultural contact. The research establishes three distinct phases of exchange: pre-modern trade-driven adaptation (7th–15th centuries), colonial-era technological transfer (16th–18th centuries), and contemporary globalized hybridization (19th–21st centuries). Particular emphasis is placed on technical knowledge transmission, contemporary artistic innovations, and the paradoxical relationship between cultural preservation and aesthetic convergence. The findings demonstrate that ceramic exchange has functioned as both a vehicle for cultural diplomacy and a catalyst for artistic innovation, generating hybrid aesthetic vocabularies that transcend traditional East-West binaries.