Scholarlink

<p>In this article, we assert that public participation events are best understood as scaffoldings that provide temporal infrastructures to citizens and that encourage “preferred ways” of acting within the participatory space. To exemplify this approach, we explore the citizens’ climate assembly (2022–2023) in Aarhus, Denmark as a case study of highly professionalised participation. Through a multi-method qualitative approach incorporating participant observation, focus groups, interviews, and surveys, we examine how both organisers and citizen members of the assembly perceive its design and implementation. In our results, we highlight two dimensions of the assembly’s scaffolding. Firstly, we analyse the guidelines that assembly organisers provided to signal what good interaction is within the assembly, namely, the Observation, Assessment, and Recommendation (OVA) method. This method shaped the affordances of members but also defined the epistemic hierarchies of contributions. Secondly, we analyse how the purpose of involving citizens in decision-making was constructed by assembly organisers and how it was communicated during the assembly, leading to uncertainties in process design and facilitation. Finally, we draw methodological and theoretical lessons from this case study and conclude that by treating participatory events as both structured and structuring, we can move beyond evaluations of participation as an ideal to be realised and instead investigate its situated practices and contestations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From structure to substance: public participation as a scaffolding technology in citizen assemblies

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月19日

查看全文
  • Sofie Illemann Jæger,
  • Julian;Iñaki Goñi

摘要

In this article, we assert that public participation events are best understood as scaffoldings that provide temporal infrastructures to citizens and that encourage “preferred ways” of acting within the participatory space. To exemplify this approach, we explore the citizens’ climate assembly (2022–2023) in Aarhus, Denmark as a case study of highly professionalised participation. Through a multi-method qualitative approach incorporating participant observation, focus groups, interviews, and surveys, we examine how both organisers and citizen members of the assembly perceive its design and implementation. In our results, we highlight two dimensions of the assembly’s scaffolding. Firstly, we analyse the guidelines that assembly organisers provided to signal what good interaction is within the assembly, namely, the Observation, Assessment, and Recommendation (OVA) method. This method shaped the affordances of members but also defined the epistemic hierarchies of contributions. Secondly, we analyse how the purpose of involving citizens in decision-making was constructed by assembly organisers and how it was communicated during the assembly, leading to uncertainties in process design and facilitation. Finally, we draw methodological and theoretical lessons from this case study and conclude that by treating participatory events as both structured and structuring, we can move beyond evaluations of participation as an ideal to be realised and instead investigate its situated practices and contestations.