Scholarlink

<p>In the face of increasing global pressure for sustainable business practices, the adoption of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) has emerged as a critical tool for enhancing Environmental Social Governance (ESG) performance. However, there remains a research gap in understanding the specific impact of EMA practices on ESG outcomes, particularly in the context of Bangladesh’s manufacturing sector. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the direct and moderating effects of EMA practices—namely Eco-Efficiency Improvement (EEI), Environmental Cost Tracking (ECT), Life Cycle Assessment Integration (LCAI), and Environmental Reporting Transparency (ERT)—on ESG performance, as well as the role of Carbon Emission Management (CEM) in influencing these relationships. Using a sample of 238 manufacturing firms, the study employs Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) for measurement and structural modeling, along with fsQCA to assess necessity conditions and perform configurational analysis. The findings reveal that EMA practices significantly impact ESG performance, with direct positive effects from EEI, ECT, LCAI, and ERT. CEM also has a direct positive effect on ESG performance and moderates the relationship between EMA practices and ESG outcomes. Additionally, fsQCA analysis identifies synergistic effects of EMA and CEM, revealing configurations that contribute to high ESG performance. The study highlights the importance of integrating EMA practices into corporate strategies for enhancing ESG outcomes. For policymakers, the results provide valuable insights into designing regulations that encourage firms to adopt and strengthen EMA practices, ultimately promoting sustainable business practices. The study suggests that policymakers should focus on creating frameworks that incentivize the adoption of comprehensive EMA strategies and support the integration of CEM, facilitating the transition to more sustainable and responsible business practices within the manufacturing sector.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Nexus of environmental management accounting, and carbon emission management on environmental, social, and governance performance: evidence from symmetrical and asymmetrical approach

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月12日

查看全文
  • Liu Xia,
  • Nazneen Fatema,
  • Md. Mominur Rahman,
  • Arman Hossain

摘要

In the face of increasing global pressure for sustainable business practices, the adoption of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) has emerged as a critical tool for enhancing Environmental Social Governance (ESG) performance. However, there remains a research gap in understanding the specific impact of EMA practices on ESG outcomes, particularly in the context of Bangladesh’s manufacturing sector. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the direct and moderating effects of EMA practices—namely Eco-Efficiency Improvement (EEI), Environmental Cost Tracking (ECT), Life Cycle Assessment Integration (LCAI), and Environmental Reporting Transparency (ERT)—on ESG performance, as well as the role of Carbon Emission Management (CEM) in influencing these relationships. Using a sample of 238 manufacturing firms, the study employs Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) for measurement and structural modeling, along with fsQCA to assess necessity conditions and perform configurational analysis. The findings reveal that EMA practices significantly impact ESG performance, with direct positive effects from EEI, ECT, LCAI, and ERT. CEM also has a direct positive effect on ESG performance and moderates the relationship between EMA practices and ESG outcomes. Additionally, fsQCA analysis identifies synergistic effects of EMA and CEM, revealing configurations that contribute to high ESG performance. The study highlights the importance of integrating EMA practices into corporate strategies for enhancing ESG outcomes. For policymakers, the results provide valuable insights into designing regulations that encourage firms to adopt and strengthen EMA practices, ultimately promoting sustainable business practices. The study suggests that policymakers should focus on creating frameworks that incentivize the adoption of comprehensive EMA strategies and support the integration of CEM, facilitating the transition to more sustainable and responsible business practices within the manufacturing sector.