Scholarlink

<p>This study employs quarterly data and the ARDL approach to explore how the growth of the green finance market influences China’s carbon neutralization capacity from 1995Q1 to 2021Q4. Findings indicate that a 1% rise in green finance market value is associated with a 0.25% increase in short-term and a 0.31% increase in long-term carbon sequestration capacity. Similarly, a 1% improvement in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investment boosts carbon neutralization capacity by 0.19% in the short term and 0.26% in the long term, demonstrating the role of ESG practices in reducing emissions. Additionally, a 1% increase in green energy production enhances carbon neutralization capacity by 0.24% in the short term and 0.17% in the long term, emphasizing the importance of renewable energy sources. However, the analysis also reveals that GDP per capita and trade liberalization negatively impact carbon sequestration, highlighting the need for sustainable development approaches. Policy recommendations include fostering carbon-neutral bonds, standardizing green bonds, supporting ESG investments, prioritizing green growth strategies, and advancing green trade policies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Green finance market and carbon neutralization capacity in China

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月26日

查看全文
  • Yanqiang Lou

摘要

This study employs quarterly data and the ARDL approach to explore how the growth of the green finance market influences China’s carbon neutralization capacity from 1995Q1 to 2021Q4. Findings indicate that a 1% rise in green finance market value is associated with a 0.25% increase in short-term and a 0.31% increase in long-term carbon sequestration capacity. Similarly, a 1% improvement in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investment boosts carbon neutralization capacity by 0.19% in the short term and 0.26% in the long term, demonstrating the role of ESG practices in reducing emissions. Additionally, a 1% increase in green energy production enhances carbon neutralization capacity by 0.24% in the short term and 0.17% in the long term, emphasizing the importance of renewable energy sources. However, the analysis also reveals that GDP per capita and trade liberalization negatively impact carbon sequestration, highlighting the need for sustainable development approaches. Policy recommendations include fostering carbon-neutral bonds, standardizing green bonds, supporting ESG investments, prioritizing green growth strategies, and advancing green trade policies.