Does Introducing Futures Markets Affect Currency Variance Forecasts? Evidence from Asian Markets
摘要
We investigate how currency volatility forecasts change after nations introduce markets for currency futures. We study three Asian markets—South Korea, India, and China. For each exchange rate, we estimate both a machine learning model—specifically the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model—and GARCH models, and compare their ability to forecast realized volatility during two periods: one directly before and one directly after the introduction of futures. We find that a Naïve historical volatility forecast typically outperforms both in-sample and real-time GARCH forecasts, and that the LSTM model outperforms its GARCH counterparts. For both GARCH and LSTM model, the mean absolute percentage error and root mean squared percentage error always increase after the introduction of futures. This latter finding indicates that realized volatility is more difficult to forecast in the aftermath of futures introduction.