<p>Intersectional theory has been criticised for neglecting religion and for being unable to account for religion’s social complexities. This contribution interrogates this critique by disaggregating different relationships of Muslim women to secular and religious varieties of patriarchy. We argue that what demarcates the challenges of intersectional analysis are the political contestations not around religion, but around women’s pro-patriarchal agency. We do so by discussing intersectional theory’s analytical usefulness and limitations in conceptualising the experiences of Muslim women. We focus on two interrelated dimensions: Muslim women in relation to secular patriarchy, and Muslim women in relation to religious patriarchy. We show that when analysed separately, the first dimension, the subjectivities of Muslim women in secular patriarchal spaces, do not pose a challenge to intersectional theory. We argue that intersectional theory’s limitations regarding the second dimension, Muslim women in relation to religious patriarchy, do not lie in its relation to Islam, but in its programmatic focus on problematising power inequalities. Lastly, in situating Muslim women at the intersection of these two dimensions, we demonstrate how intersectional analysis can reveal not only Muslim women’s marginalisation, but also the analytical marginalisations of Muslim feminisms.</p>