Scholarlink

<p>This paper examines governance, power dynamics, and inequalities within the Tanzanian broiler chicken value chain by applying the Global Value Chain (GVC) framework. Utilizing qualitative data from key stakeholders, this study delineates four categories of broiler producer strands: Fully Integrated, Partially Integrated, Contract, and Independent Producers, each influenced by hierarchical, captive, or market governance structures. The findings highlight significant power imbalances, with fully integrated producers dominating the input and output markets. In contrast, small-scale producers encounter weak coordination, restricted access to inputs, and unstable market conditions that hinder their growth. These dynamics perpetuate price disparities and market control, contributing to inefficiencies and a persistent production–consumption gap that necessitates reliance on imports to bridge this gap. The study advocates for enhanced coordination through the development of modern processing and marketing infrastructure, expansion of inclusive contracting schemes, and improvements to the business environment for breeding and feed companies. Effective policy implementation is essential for reducing dependency, enhancing competitiveness, and promoting equity in the industry. Addressing these imbalances will enable the broiler industry to contribute more effectively to Tanzania’s food security and economic development.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Governance, Power, and Inequalities in the Tanzanian Broiler Chicken Value Chain

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月3日

查看全文
  • Judith Rejea Valerian,
  • Fulgence Mishili,
  • Daniel Wilson Ndyetabula,
  • Niels Fold

摘要

This paper examines governance, power dynamics, and inequalities within the Tanzanian broiler chicken value chain by applying the Global Value Chain (GVC) framework. Utilizing qualitative data from key stakeholders, this study delineates four categories of broiler producer strands: Fully Integrated, Partially Integrated, Contract, and Independent Producers, each influenced by hierarchical, captive, or market governance structures. The findings highlight significant power imbalances, with fully integrated producers dominating the input and output markets. In contrast, small-scale producers encounter weak coordination, restricted access to inputs, and unstable market conditions that hinder their growth. These dynamics perpetuate price disparities and market control, contributing to inefficiencies and a persistent production–consumption gap that necessitates reliance on imports to bridge this gap. The study advocates for enhanced coordination through the development of modern processing and marketing infrastructure, expansion of inclusive contracting schemes, and improvements to the business environment for breeding and feed companies. Effective policy implementation is essential for reducing dependency, enhancing competitiveness, and promoting equity in the industry. Addressing these imbalances will enable the broiler industry to contribute more effectively to Tanzania’s food security and economic development.