Scholarlink

<p>This article outlines the approach for conducting an evidence review on the effectiveness of results-based payments (RBPs). Specifically, this evidence review will adopt a broad approach to take stock of the literature on the effectiveness of RBP interventions across (1) all sectors where they have been used (such as agriculture, education and health); (2) multiple types of outcomes; and (3) multiple levels (namely, assessments of RBP interventions that target outcomes at the beneficiary, service provider, investor and system-wide levels). The approach paper then describes the evidence review’s literature search procedure, which—consistent with its broad approach—will target both academic outlets and the grey literature. Based on rigorous screening and data extraction procedures, this evidence review will produce evidence gap maps and an intervention heat map. The former will shed light on where the literature on the effectiveness of RBP intervention is relatively dense and where key knowledge gaps remain salient. Subsequently, an intervention heat map will highlight how the distribution of the Green Climate Fund’s RBP project financing relates to the existing evidence base. In so doing, the evidence review will aim to generate insights that inform the enhanced application of RBP interventions to meet international, national and regional climate change goals.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evidence Review on Results-Based Payments: Approach Paper

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月27日

查看全文
  • Josh Meuth Alldredge,
  • Emma De Roy,
  • Elangtlhoko Mokgano,
  • Peter Mwandri,
  • Tulika Narayan,
  • Martin Prowse,
  • Jyotsna Puri,
  • William Rafferty,
  • Anu Rangarajan,
  • Faraz Usmani

摘要

This article outlines the approach for conducting an evidence review on the effectiveness of results-based payments (RBPs). Specifically, this evidence review will adopt a broad approach to take stock of the literature on the effectiveness of RBP interventions across (1) all sectors where they have been used (such as agriculture, education and health); (2) multiple types of outcomes; and (3) multiple levels (namely, assessments of RBP interventions that target outcomes at the beneficiary, service provider, investor and system-wide levels). The approach paper then describes the evidence review’s literature search procedure, which—consistent with its broad approach—will target both academic outlets and the grey literature. Based on rigorous screening and data extraction procedures, this evidence review will produce evidence gap maps and an intervention heat map. The former will shed light on where the literature on the effectiveness of RBP intervention is relatively dense and where key knowledge gaps remain salient. Subsequently, an intervention heat map will highlight how the distribution of the Green Climate Fund’s RBP project financing relates to the existing evidence base. In so doing, the evidence review will aim to generate insights that inform the enhanced application of RBP interventions to meet international, national and regional climate change goals.