Scholarlink

<p>This review examines Tim Prenzler’s <i>Preventing Crime and Disorder in Public Places</i>, a concise yet wide-ranging contribution to the security and crime-prevention literature. Written for practitioners across policing, private security, municipal governance, town planning and social services, the book is deliberately pitched as an accessible, evidence-informed guide that translates core criminological theories into “do-able” strategies for public-space safety. Its core strengths lie in the integration of opportunity-based crime-prevention frameworks with practical interventions, the promotion of blended public-safety models that combine enforcement with welfare, and its attention to seemingly minor but highly consequential design and management details. While the short format limits extended treatment of technology, surveillance and financial considerations, these omissions operate as invitations for further work rather than critical gaps. Overall, the book is a timely and essential resource that reframes public safety as a shared responsibility requiring collaboration, inclusivity and ethical stewardship across sectors.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Prenzler, T.: preventing crime and disorder in public places: blending opportunity reduction, guardianship and welfare

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月19日

查看全文
  • Michael White

摘要

This review examines Tim Prenzler’s Preventing Crime and Disorder in Public Places, a concise yet wide-ranging contribution to the security and crime-prevention literature. Written for practitioners across policing, private security, municipal governance, town planning and social services, the book is deliberately pitched as an accessible, evidence-informed guide that translates core criminological theories into “do-able” strategies for public-space safety. Its core strengths lie in the integration of opportunity-based crime-prevention frameworks with practical interventions, the promotion of blended public-safety models that combine enforcement with welfare, and its attention to seemingly minor but highly consequential design and management details. While the short format limits extended treatment of technology, surveillance and financial considerations, these omissions operate as invitations for further work rather than critical gaps. Overall, the book is a timely and essential resource that reframes public safety as a shared responsibility requiring collaboration, inclusivity and ethical stewardship across sectors.