Scholarlink

<p>This article offers an account of the disappearance of anamorphosis from Jacques Lacan’s analysis of visuality between Seminar XI and Seminar XIII. In the former, anamorphosis is deployed as a central example for demonstrating the role of the <i>objet a</i> in the constitution of the visual field. In Seminar XIII, however, Lacan’s account is markedly different. Following Lacan’s invocation of Erwin Panofsky, I attempt to explicate the significance of this disappearance and its relevance for Lacan’s conceptions of fantasy and subjectivity.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From anamorphosis to the distance point: Lacan’s logical revision of the subject as split in the visual field

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月17日

查看全文
  • Kyle Sossamon

摘要

This article offers an account of the disappearance of anamorphosis from Jacques Lacan’s analysis of visuality between Seminar XI and Seminar XIII. In the former, anamorphosis is deployed as a central example for demonstrating the role of the objet a in the constitution of the visual field. In Seminar XIII, however, Lacan’s account is markedly different. Following Lacan’s invocation of Erwin Panofsky, I attempt to explicate the significance of this disappearance and its relevance for Lacan’s conceptions of fantasy and subjectivity.