<p>This article <i>aims</i> to read Gustav Klimt’s <i>Baby (Cradle)</i> alongside Jacques Lacan’s ‘The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis’, and ‘The Mirror Stage as Formation of the <i>I</i> Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience’. At stake here, and indeed already within the title of the painting, is a question of naming and supplementation: where is the object of study? Where is the baby to be found? I argue that Lacan’s texts challenge the foundations of psychoanalytic pedagogy and engage in the politics of psychoanalysis and its queerness which refuses an idea of an ultimate explanation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

‘A newborn’s cry’: What Lacan’s talk almost wasn’t

  • Bonnie McGill

摘要

This article aims to read Gustav Klimt’s Baby (Cradle) alongside Jacques Lacan’s ‘The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis’, and ‘The Mirror Stage as Formation of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience’. At stake here, and indeed already within the title of the painting, is a question of naming and supplementation: where is the object of study? Where is the baby to be found? I argue that Lacan’s texts challenge the foundations of psychoanalytic pedagogy and engage in the politics of psychoanalysis and its queerness which refuses an idea of an ultimate explanation.