Scholarlink

<p>With growing consumer expectations for transparency, brands are increasingly adopting candid communication strategies. However, empirical evidence on how disclosing negative brand activities influences consumer responses remains limited. Drawing on signalling theory, and specifically the concept of costly signals, this study investigates the impact of negative brand disclosures on word-of-mouth intentions, focussing on the mediating role of perceived brand transparency. Across three experimental studies involving both fictitious (hotels) and real brands (telecommunications and retail), we find that disclosures regarding negative brand activities are perceived as more transparent than positive ones. Perceived transparency serves as a key mechanism in reducing negative word-of-mouth, particularly for brands with lower credibility. This effect weakens as credibility increases, suggesting that costly signalling is especially beneficial for less credible brands. These findings offer novel insights into how brands can strategically leverage transparency to manage reputational risk when acknowledging shortcomings.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Acknowledging brand shortcomings: the interplay between negative disclosures, brand transparency, brand credibility, and word-of-mouth

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月16日

查看全文
  • Kate Sansome,
  • Jodie Conduit,
  • Dean Wilkie

摘要

With growing consumer expectations for transparency, brands are increasingly adopting candid communication strategies. However, empirical evidence on how disclosing negative brand activities influences consumer responses remains limited. Drawing on signalling theory, and specifically the concept of costly signals, this study investigates the impact of negative brand disclosures on word-of-mouth intentions, focussing on the mediating role of perceived brand transparency. Across three experimental studies involving both fictitious (hotels) and real brands (telecommunications and retail), we find that disclosures regarding negative brand activities are perceived as more transparent than positive ones. Perceived transparency serves as a key mechanism in reducing negative word-of-mouth, particularly for brands with lower credibility. This effect weakens as credibility increases, suggesting that costly signalling is especially beneficial for less credible brands. These findings offer novel insights into how brands can strategically leverage transparency to manage reputational risk when acknowledging shortcomings.