Scholarlink

<p>W. R. D. Fairbairn developed a unique metapsychology that began as controversial but eventually transformed the trajectory of psychoanalytic ideas by emphasizing the innate need for real relationships. His conception of the unconscious differs from Freud’s and provides the foundation upon which he elaborated a new model of the mind. Fairbairn describes the first object relations theory by linking a part of the self to unconscious bad objects. While many clinicians have been hesitant to accept his proposition that good objects do not become part of the dynamic unconscious, it is argued that this is a clinically useful and valid model of human psychology. For Fairbairn, the good object is a preconscious internalization and available for engagement with the external world without distortion. His model of the mind, focusing on the unconscious, helps clinicians conceptualize how early relational experiences limit satisfying contemporary life.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Fairbairn’s Rationale for Excluding Good Objects from the Unconscious: Clinical Implications

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月20日

查看全文
  • Ron B. Aviram

摘要

W. R. D. Fairbairn developed a unique metapsychology that began as controversial but eventually transformed the trajectory of psychoanalytic ideas by emphasizing the innate need for real relationships. His conception of the unconscious differs from Freud’s and provides the foundation upon which he elaborated a new model of the mind. Fairbairn describes the first object relations theory by linking a part of the self to unconscious bad objects. While many clinicians have been hesitant to accept his proposition that good objects do not become part of the dynamic unconscious, it is argued that this is a clinically useful and valid model of human psychology. For Fairbairn, the good object is a preconscious internalization and available for engagement with the external world without distortion. His model of the mind, focusing on the unconscious, helps clinicians conceptualize how early relational experiences limit satisfying contemporary life.