Scholarlink

<p>Martin Bergmann demonstrates different aspects of what is very distinctively, a psychoanalytic orientation of mind in extension of viewpoint and value, having no equal in our postmodern world. Unselfconscious in forthright use of the analyst’s personality in demonstration of psychoanalytic thinking, Bergmann’s <CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1963</CitationRef> paper “The Place of Paul Federn’s Ego Psychology in Psychoanalytic Metapsychology” presents a Rosetta Stone for discerning the Jewishly inflected and particular cultural presence of <i>Bildung</i> (Mosse, <CitationRef CitationID="CR35">1985</CitationRef>; Sorkin, <CitationRef CitationID="CR41">1983</CitationRef>, <CitationRef CitationID="CR42">1987</CitationRef>), the Enlightenment practice of self-development, in the textual history of psychoanalysis.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The unheimlich ghosts of Bildung: on reading Martin Bergmann reading Paul Federn

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月1日

查看全文
  • Ian S. Miller

摘要

Martin Bergmann demonstrates different aspects of what is very distinctively, a psychoanalytic orientation of mind in extension of viewpoint and value, having no equal in our postmodern world. Unselfconscious in forthright use of the analyst’s personality in demonstration of psychoanalytic thinking, Bergmann’s 1963 paper “The Place of Paul Federn’s Ego Psychology in Psychoanalytic Metapsychology” presents a Rosetta Stone for discerning the Jewishly inflected and particular cultural presence of Bildung (Mosse, 1985; Sorkin, 1983, 1987), the Enlightenment practice of self-development, in the textual history of psychoanalysis.