<p>An attempt was made to demonstrate the efficient and selective extraction of the tetravalent plutonium from aqueous nitric acid medium using a novel anion functionalized task-specific ionic liquid: tri-<i>n</i>-octyl methyl ammonium <i>n</i>-dodecyl sulfate [<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({({\rm{C}}}_{8}{)}_{3}{{\rm{C}}}_{1}{{\rm{N}}}^{+}{{\rm{DS}}}^{-}]\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>8</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">DS</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The maximum separation factor for Pu(IV) over U(VI) was found to be more than 10<sup>3</sup>; whereas that for Pu(IV) over Am(III) was more than 10<sup>5</sup>. At 4 M HNO<sub>3</sub>, the majority of Pu existed as <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}^{2+}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Pu</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (~80%) and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\rm{Pu}}{({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3})}^{3+}\,( \sim 11 \% )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Pu</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo>(</mo> <mo>~</mo> <mn>11</mn> <mo>%</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, leading to the formation of ML<sub>2</sub> and ML<sub>3</sub> species viz. (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}^{2+}\,({\rm{D}}{{\rm{S}}}^{-}{)}_{2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Pu</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msup> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}^{2+}\,({\rm{D}}{{\rm{S}}}^{-}{)}_{3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Pu</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msup> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). On the other hand, in 8 M HNO<sub>3</sub>, plutonium existed as cationic, neutral, and anionic species with the relative composition: Pu(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup> ~16%, Pu(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub><sup>2-</sup>(~42%), and Pu(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> ~ 40%. Hence, the extraction of Pu(IV) proceeded via the <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(({({\rm{C}}}_{8}{)}_{3}{{\rm{C}}}_{1}{{\rm{N}}}^{+}{)}_{2}{\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{6}^{2-}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>8</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msup> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Pu</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{{\rm{O}}}_{3})}_{4}.\,{({\rm{C}}}_{8}{)}_{3}{{\rm{C}}}_{1}{{\rm{N}}}^{+}{{\rm{DS}}}^{-}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Pu</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <msub> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>.</mo> <mspace width="1em" /> <msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>8</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">DS</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}^{2+}\,({\rm{D}}{{\rm{S}}}^{-}{)}_{2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Pu</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msup> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, species getting transferred into the ionic liquid phase. In the case of uranium, such speciation analyses were performed as well, which revealed the predominance of the ML<sub>2</sub> species: <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(({\rm{U}}{{\rm{O}}}_{2}^{2+})\,({\rm{D}}{{\rm{S}}}^{-}{)}_{2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">U</mi> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>)</mo> <mspace width="1em" /> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msup> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\rm{U}}{{\rm{O}}}_{2}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}.\,2{({\rm{C}}}_{8}{)}_{3}{{\rm{C}}}_{1}{{\rm{N}}}^{+}{{\rm{DS}}}^{-}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">U</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>.</mo> <mspace width="1em" /> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>8</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">DS</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> during its extraction from 4 M HNO<sub>3</sub> and 8 M HNO<sub>3</sub>, respectively. The sluggishness in the extraction of Pu(IV) and U(VI) was attributed to the viscosity-induced slow diffusion of the actinides and the actinide-ionic liquid complexes. The extraction processes were exothermic. The extent of exothermicity was found to be greater for Pu(IV) as compared to that for U(VI), and it was more for the extraction from 8 M HNO<sub>3</sub>. The solvent systems exhibited good radiation stability. However, a gradual deterioration in the extraction performance with increasing gamma ray exposure was evidenced. Multiple contacts with a solution of 10 mM of oxalic acid were found to be effective for quantitative back extraction of Pu(IV) from the loaded ionic liquid phase.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Efficient extraction of tetravalent actinide from nitric acid feeds using tri-N-octyl methyl ammonium N-dodecyl sulphate functionalized task-specific ionic liquid

  • Surekha D. Chowta,
  • Arijit Sengupta,
  • Prasanta K. Mohapatra

摘要

An attempt was made to demonstrate the efficient and selective extraction of the tetravalent plutonium from aqueous nitric acid medium using a novel anion functionalized task-specific ionic liquid: tri-n-octyl methyl ammonium n-dodecyl sulfate [ \({({\rm{C}}}_{8}{)}_{3}{{\rm{C}}}_{1}{{\rm{N}}}^{+}{{\rm{DS}}}^{-}]\) ( C 8 ) 3 C 1 N + DS ] . The maximum separation factor for Pu(IV) over U(VI) was found to be more than 103; whereas that for Pu(IV) over Am(III) was more than 105. At 4 M HNO3, the majority of Pu existed as \({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}^{2+}\) Pu ( N O 3 ) 2 2 + (~80%) and \({\rm{Pu}}{({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3})}^{3+}\,( \sim 11 \% )\) Pu ( N O 3 ) 3 + ( ~ 11 % ) , leading to the formation of ML2 and ML3 species viz. ( \({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}^{2+}\,({\rm{D}}{{\rm{S}}}^{-}{)}_{2}\) Pu ( N O 3 ) 2 2 + ( D S ) 2 and \({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}^{2+}\,({\rm{D}}{{\rm{S}}}^{-}{)}_{3}\) Pu ( N O 3 ) 2 2 + ( D S ) 3 ). On the other hand, in 8 M HNO3, plutonium existed as cationic, neutral, and anionic species with the relative composition: Pu(NO3)22+ ~16%, Pu(NO3)62-(~42%), and Pu(NO3)4 ~ 40%. Hence, the extraction of Pu(IV) proceeded via the \(({({\rm{C}}}_{8}{)}_{3}{{\rm{C}}}_{1}{{\rm{N}}}^{+}{)}_{2}{\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{6}^{2-}\) ( ( C 8 ) 3 C 1 N + ) 2 Pu ( N O 3 ) 6 2 , \({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{{\rm{O}}}_{3})}_{4}.\,{({\rm{C}}}_{8}{)}_{3}{{\rm{C}}}_{1}{{\rm{N}}}^{+}{{\rm{DS}}}^{-}\) Pu ( N O 3 ) 4 . ( C 8 ) 3 C 1 N + DS and \({\rm{Pu}}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}^{2+}\,({\rm{D}}{{\rm{S}}}^{-}{)}_{2}\) Pu ( N O 3 ) 2 2 + ( D S ) 2 , species getting transferred into the ionic liquid phase. In the case of uranium, such speciation analyses were performed as well, which revealed the predominance of the ML2 species: \(({\rm{U}}{{\rm{O}}}_{2}^{2+})\,({\rm{D}}{{\rm{S}}}^{-}{)}_{2}\) ( U O 2 2 + ) ( D S ) 2 and \({\rm{U}}{{\rm{O}}}_{2}({\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}}_{3}{)}_{2}.\,2{({\rm{C}}}_{8}{)}_{3}{{\rm{C}}}_{1}{{\rm{N}}}^{+}{{\rm{DS}}}^{-}\) U O 2 ( N O 3 ) 2 . 2 ( C 8 ) 3 C 1 N + DS during its extraction from 4 M HNO3 and 8 M HNO3, respectively. The sluggishness in the extraction of Pu(IV) and U(VI) was attributed to the viscosity-induced slow diffusion of the actinides and the actinide-ionic liquid complexes. The extraction processes were exothermic. The extent of exothermicity was found to be greater for Pu(IV) as compared to that for U(VI), and it was more for the extraction from 8 M HNO3. The solvent systems exhibited good radiation stability. However, a gradual deterioration in the extraction performance with increasing gamma ray exposure was evidenced. Multiple contacts with a solution of 10 mM of oxalic acid were found to be effective for quantitative back extraction of Pu(IV) from the loaded ionic liquid phase.