Scholarlink

<p>Improving building energy efficiency is critical for urban decarbonization, yet its system-level costs and benefits remain insufficiently quantified. Here we conduct a cost–benefit analysis of demand-side energy efficiency upgrades in China’s urban buildings from 2020 to 2050 by integrating building stock dynamics, energy simulation and power system planning models. Results indicate that energy system savings (for example, reduced capital and operating costs for the power grid as well as reduced fuel costs) largely offset the associated investment costs (for example, heating and cooling equipment and building envelope energy efficiency), even without accounting for additional social and environmental co-benefits. However, a key barrier to implementation lies in the misalignment between cost bearers and beneficiaries. Although system-wide savings reduce overall electricity supply costs and benefit ratepayers and society, the investment costs are borne primarily by developers and homeowners. This imbalance highlights the need for policy interventions, including financial incentives and reforms to district heating pricing, to enable large-scale adoption and accelerate urban building decarbonization.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Energy system savings largely offset the costs of urban building energy efficiency improvements in China

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月24日

查看全文
  • Shangwei Liu,
  • Xiangwen Fu,
  • Liqun Peng,
  • Siyue Guo,
  • Denise L. Mauzerall

摘要

Improving building energy efficiency is critical for urban decarbonization, yet its system-level costs and benefits remain insufficiently quantified. Here we conduct a cost–benefit analysis of demand-side energy efficiency upgrades in China’s urban buildings from 2020 to 2050 by integrating building stock dynamics, energy simulation and power system planning models. Results indicate that energy system savings (for example, reduced capital and operating costs for the power grid as well as reduced fuel costs) largely offset the associated investment costs (for example, heating and cooling equipment and building envelope energy efficiency), even without accounting for additional social and environmental co-benefits. However, a key barrier to implementation lies in the misalignment between cost bearers and beneficiaries. Although system-wide savings reduce overall electricity supply costs and benefit ratepayers and society, the investment costs are borne primarily by developers and homeowners. This imbalance highlights the need for policy interventions, including financial incentives and reforms to district heating pricing, to enable large-scale adoption and accelerate urban building decarbonization.