Scholarlink

<p>This reply addresses concerns raised in the Matters Arising letter, emphasizing the rigor of our empirical study on student well-being outcomes with ISAs. We clarify methodological decisions, address speculative claims regarding Replika’s marketing and usage, and highlight our study’s focus on peer-reviewed, evidence-based findings. Ethical considerations and potential conflicts of interest are transparently discussed, reinforcing our commitment to scientific integrity and advancing knowledge in the field of AI and mental health.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Reply to: A response to loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月17日

查看全文
  • Bethanie Maples,
  • Merve Cerit,
  • Aditya Vishwanath,
  • Roy Pea

摘要

This reply addresses concerns raised in the Matters Arising letter, emphasizing the rigor of our empirical study on student well-being outcomes with ISAs. We clarify methodological decisions, address speculative claims regarding Replika’s marketing and usage, and highlight our study’s focus on peer-reviewed, evidence-based findings. Ethical considerations and potential conflicts of interest are transparently discussed, reinforcing our commitment to scientific integrity and advancing knowledge in the field of AI and mental health.