Scholarlink

Background <p>An increasing number of children and adults&#xa0;who are deaf are receiving cochlear implants in both ears (bilateral CIs or BiCIs), promoting the possibility of access to binaural cues. However, their effectiveness remains limited, as they do not adequately restore key acoustic cues for sound localization, particularly interaural time differences (ITDs) at low frequencies. The cochlea, the auditory sensory organ, typically transmits information for encoding ITDs more effectively at the apical region, which is specifically “tuned” to low frequencies. However, sensitivity to electrically-stimulated ITDs does not necessarily follow the non-implanted anatomy. We hypothesized that effective restoration of robust ITD perception through electrical stimulation with BiCIs depends on targeting cochlear locations that transmit information most effectively.</p> Methods <p>We created a personalized sound-coding strategy that delivered ITDs to each participant’s single “best” cochlear location. We then evaluated the spatial hearing of 14 BiCI listeners using this “Best” strategy and compared it with three control strategies.</p> Results <p>Here, we show an improvement in perception of ITDs with a tone stimulus with the “Best” strategy. However, this benefit does not seem to translate to speech stimuli.</p> Conclusions <p>This suggests that restoration of ITD sensitivity requires targeting more than one good cochlear location for redundancy when it comes to more complex sounds such as speech.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Best cochlear locations for delivering interaural timing cues in electric hearing

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月10日

查看全文
  • Agudemu Borjigin,
  • Stephen R. Dennison,
  • Tanvi Thakkar,
  • Alan Kan,
  • Ruth Y. Litovsky

摘要

Background

An increasing number of children and adults who are deaf are receiving cochlear implants in both ears (bilateral CIs or BiCIs), promoting the possibility of access to binaural cues. However, their effectiveness remains limited, as they do not adequately restore key acoustic cues for sound localization, particularly interaural time differences (ITDs) at low frequencies. The cochlea, the auditory sensory organ, typically transmits information for encoding ITDs more effectively at the apical region, which is specifically “tuned” to low frequencies. However, sensitivity to electrically-stimulated ITDs does not necessarily follow the non-implanted anatomy. We hypothesized that effective restoration of robust ITD perception through electrical stimulation with BiCIs depends on targeting cochlear locations that transmit information most effectively.

Methods

We created a personalized sound-coding strategy that delivered ITDs to each participant’s single “best” cochlear location. We then evaluated the spatial hearing of 14 BiCI listeners using this “Best” strategy and compared it with three control strategies.

Results

Here, we show an improvement in perception of ITDs with a tone stimulus with the “Best” strategy. However, this benefit does not seem to translate to speech stimuli.

Conclusions

This suggests that restoration of ITD sensitivity requires targeting more than one good cochlear location for redundancy when it comes to more complex sounds such as speech.