Scholarlink

<p>The measurement of tunneling times in strong-field ionization has been the topic of much controversy in recent years, with the attoclock and Larmor clock being two of the main contenders for correctly reproducing these times. While the non-zero Larmor tunneling time has been unambiguously detected, the tunneling time measured by the attoclock appears to vanish in tunnel ionization of a hydrogen atom. By expressing the attoclock as the weak value of temporal delay, we extend its meaning beyond the traditional setup and connect it to the weak-value interpretation of the Larmor clock. Our approach allows us to derive the position-resolved attoclock tunneling time. We show how this time, while non-zero at the tunnel exit, vanishes at the detector, far away from the atom. Formally, this means that the attoclock does not measure the “local” Larmor time, but instead a “non-local” time closely related to the phase time.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Unifying attoclock and Larmor measurements through position-resolved weak values

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月17日

查看全文
  • Pablo M. Maier,
  • Serguei Patchkovskii,
  • Misha Yu. Ivanov,
  • Olga Smirnova

摘要

The measurement of tunneling times in strong-field ionization has been the topic of much controversy in recent years, with the attoclock and Larmor clock being two of the main contenders for correctly reproducing these times. While the non-zero Larmor tunneling time has been unambiguously detected, the tunneling time measured by the attoclock appears to vanish in tunnel ionization of a hydrogen atom. By expressing the attoclock as the weak value of temporal delay, we extend its meaning beyond the traditional setup and connect it to the weak-value interpretation of the Larmor clock. Our approach allows us to derive the position-resolved attoclock tunneling time. We show how this time, while non-zero at the tunnel exit, vanishes at the detector, far away from the atom. Formally, this means that the attoclock does not measure the “local” Larmor time, but instead a “non-local” time closely related to the phase time.