Scholarlink

<p>CRISPR-mediated endogenous tagging is a powerful tool in biological research. Inhibiting the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway has been shown to improve the low efficiency of accurate knock-in via homology-directed repair (HDR). However, the influence of alternative double-stranded break (DSB) repair pathways on knock-in remains to be fully explored. In this study, our long-read amplicon sequencing analysis reveals various patterns of imprecise repair in CRISPR-mediated knock-in, even with NHEJ inhibition. Further suppressing either microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) or single-strand annealing (SSA) reduces nucleotide deletions around the cut site, thereby elevating knock-in accuracy. Additionally, imprecise donor integration is reduced by inhibiting SSA, but not MMEJ. Particularly, SSA suppression reduced asymmetric HDR, a specific imprecise integration pattern, which we further confirm using a novel reporter system. These findings demonstrate the complex interplay of multiple DSB repair pathways in CRISPR-mediated knock-in and offer novel strategies, including SSA pathway targeting, to improve precise gene editing efficiency.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparative analysis of multiple DNA double-strand break repair pathways in CRISPR-mediated endogenous tagging

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月13日

查看全文
  • Chiharu Tei,
  • Shoji Hata,
  • Akira Mabuchi,
  • Shotaro Okuda,
  • Kei K. Ito,
  • Mariya Genova,
  • Masamitsu Fukuyama,
  • Shohei Yamamoto,
  • Takumi Chinen,
  • Atsushi Toyoda,
  • Daiju Kitagawa

摘要

CRISPR-mediated endogenous tagging is a powerful tool in biological research. Inhibiting the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway has been shown to improve the low efficiency of accurate knock-in via homology-directed repair (HDR). However, the influence of alternative double-stranded break (DSB) repair pathways on knock-in remains to be fully explored. In this study, our long-read amplicon sequencing analysis reveals various patterns of imprecise repair in CRISPR-mediated knock-in, even with NHEJ inhibition. Further suppressing either microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) or single-strand annealing (SSA) reduces nucleotide deletions around the cut site, thereby elevating knock-in accuracy. Additionally, imprecise donor integration is reduced by inhibiting SSA, but not MMEJ. Particularly, SSA suppression reduced asymmetric HDR, a specific imprecise integration pattern, which we further confirm using a novel reporter system. These findings demonstrate the complex interplay of multiple DSB repair pathways in CRISPR-mediated knock-in and offer novel strategies, including SSA pathway targeting, to improve precise gene editing efficiency.