<p>The EU AI Act subjects high-risk clinical AI systems to deployer obligations whose institutional operationalization remains undefined. Drawing on experience at a French comprehensive cancer center, we present a governance framework combining three novel components: a dual-axis model for institutional risk stratification, a five-category AI-related adverse event taxonomy inspired by pharmacovigilance, and structured proficiency testing against simulated AI errors. Successful AI integration depends on institutional readiness, not algorithmic performance.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Operationalizing the EU AI Act in a comprehensive cancer center through an institutional governance framework

  • W. Gehin,
  • JC Faivre,
  • JE Bibault,
  • Y. Thiery,
  • S. Deon,
  • E. Desandes,
  • A. Lambert,
  • A. Baudin,
  • M. Schoumacker,
  • P. Eschwege,
  • S. Supiot,
  • T. Perennec,
  • D. Peiffert

摘要

The EU AI Act subjects high-risk clinical AI systems to deployer obligations whose institutional operationalization remains undefined. Drawing on experience at a French comprehensive cancer center, we present a governance framework combining three novel components: a dual-axis model for institutional risk stratification, a five-category AI-related adverse event taxonomy inspired by pharmacovigilance, and structured proficiency testing against simulated AI errors. Successful AI integration depends on institutional readiness, not algorithmic performance.