<p>This reply addresses Wang et al.’s comments on our prior work and clarifies that the 34.5-point Knee Society Score threshold was derived from our previously validated, anchor-based approach. We agree that future research should refine predictive models by establishing consensus, standardised minimal clinically important difference cutoffs to enhance applicability and reliability in real-world clinical settings.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Reply to determining MCID threshold for Knee Society Score to assess patient satisfaction in knee arthroplasty

  • Xiaodi Liu,
  • Yingnan Liu,
  • Mong Li Lee,
  • Wynne Hsu,
  • Ming Han Lincoln Liow

摘要

This reply addresses Wang et al.’s comments on our prior work and clarifies that the 34.5-point Knee Society Score threshold was derived from our previously validated, anchor-based approach. We agree that future research should refine predictive models by establishing consensus, standardised minimal clinically important difference cutoffs to enhance applicability and reliability in real-world clinical settings.