<p>Machine learning has shown promise in medical image classification. However, its generalizability remains challenging. Here, we show that data-efficient pre-surgical prognostication of prostate cancer from biopsy specimens is enabled by versatile feature extraction from whole-mount histopathology and a clinically informed intermediate reasoning step. With data from multiple institutions, our pipeline resolved dual-domain shifts across specimen types and institutions and achieved consistent external validation, reinforced by comprehensive analyses of generalizability. This highlights the robustness of our prognostic approach when compared to the Gleason grading system. We establish an equitable, interpretable, and clinically applicable framework, supporting actionable decisions for prognosis and treatment planning, even in limited real-world clinical environments.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Clinically informed intermediate reasoning enables generalizable prostate cancer prognostication through machine learning in limited settings

  • Jun Akatsuka,
  • Kotaro Tsutsumi,
  • Mami Takadate,
  • Yasushi Numata,
  • Hiromu Morikawa,
  • Atsushi Marugame,
  • Hayato Takeda,
  • Yuki Endo,
  • Yuka Toyama,
  • Takayuki Takahashi,
  • Kaori Ono,
  • Junya Iwazaki,
  • Ryuji Ohashi,
  • Akira Shimizu,
  • Tomoharu Kiyuna,
  • Maki Ogura,
  • Masao Ueki,
  • Takuma Kato,
  • Toshiyuki China,
  • Mikio Sugimoto,
  • Hisamitsu Ide,
  • Naoto Sassa,
  • Naonori Ueda,
  • Shigeo Horie,
  • Toyonori Tsuzuki,
  • Go Kimura,
  • Yukihiro Kondo,
  • Yoichiro Yamamoto

摘要

Machine learning has shown promise in medical image classification. However, its generalizability remains challenging. Here, we show that data-efficient pre-surgical prognostication of prostate cancer from biopsy specimens is enabled by versatile feature extraction from whole-mount histopathology and a clinically informed intermediate reasoning step. With data from multiple institutions, our pipeline resolved dual-domain shifts across specimen types and institutions and achieved consistent external validation, reinforced by comprehensive analyses of generalizability. This highlights the robustness of our prognostic approach when compared to the Gleason grading system. We establish an equitable, interpretable, and clinically applicable framework, supporting actionable decisions for prognosis and treatment planning, even in limited real-world clinical environments.