Scholarlink

<p>Digital health technologies hold significant potential for reducing global healthcare disparities. Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to enhance access to culturally specific healthcare, including traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This study evaluated the diagnostic and treatment performance of seven publicly available LLMs using a real-world acupuncture case, comparing their outputs with three professional acupuncturists across five domains: Western diagnosis, TCM diagnosis, acupoint selection, needling technique, and herbal medicine. Twenty-eight expert evaluators from China, South Korea, and the United States assessed the responses using a multilingual survey. LLMs performed comparably to acupuncturists in Western diagnosis and showed variable performance in TCM-specific tasks. GPT-4o, Qwen 2.5 Max, and Doubao 1.5 Pro demonstrated the highest alignment with expert evaluations, particularly in TCM diagnosis and acupoint selection. These findings highlight the potential of general-purpose LLMs to support culturally grounded medical decision-making and reduce access barriers in TCM care systems.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluating the role of large language models in traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment recommendations

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月21日

查看全文
  • Yu Liu,
  • Yishan Yuan,
  • Keming Yan,
  • Yuanyuan Li,
  • Valeria Sacca,
  • Sierra Hodges,
  • Mattia Cannistra,
  • Pauline Jeong,
  • Jiani Wu,
  • Jian Kong

摘要

Digital health technologies hold significant potential for reducing global healthcare disparities. Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to enhance access to culturally specific healthcare, including traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This study evaluated the diagnostic and treatment performance of seven publicly available LLMs using a real-world acupuncture case, comparing their outputs with three professional acupuncturists across five domains: Western diagnosis, TCM diagnosis, acupoint selection, needling technique, and herbal medicine. Twenty-eight expert evaluators from China, South Korea, and the United States assessed the responses using a multilingual survey. LLMs performed comparably to acupuncturists in Western diagnosis and showed variable performance in TCM-specific tasks. GPT-4o, Qwen 2.5 Max, and Doubao 1.5 Pro demonstrated the highest alignment with expert evaluations, particularly in TCM diagnosis and acupoint selection. These findings highlight the potential of general-purpose LLMs to support culturally grounded medical decision-making and reduce access barriers in TCM care systems.