Scholarlink

<p>Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) via next-generation sequencing is standard clinical practice for advanced and metastatic cancers in the U.S. and can help identify clinically actionable alterations in patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. CGP can also complement clinicopathological findings and in certain cases, may lead to diagnostic recharacterization resulting in more precise therapeutic strategies. Here, we highlight examples where molecular findings resulted in tumor re-evaluation and subsequent recharacterization. Twenty-eight cases where CGP results were inconsistent with initial pathological diagnosis and clinical presentation were selected for secondary clinicopathological review to explore alternative diagnostic explanations more consistent with the genomic results. Genomic profiling identified clinically actionable and prognostic variants leading to more accurate therapeutic recommendations based on the updated diagnoses highlighting the value of CGP beyond biomarker detection for therapy selection and supporting its complementary use in diagnostic confirmation to unveil opportunities for precision medicine strategies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Tumor diagnosis recharacterization enabled by comprehensive genomic profiling to guide precision medicine strategy

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月21日

查看全文
  • Ann Carr,
  • Jennifer B. Jackson,
  • Chris Coldren,
  • Pranil Chandra,
  • Faezeh Koohestani,
  • Michelle Shiller,
  • Robert Auber

摘要

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) via next-generation sequencing is standard clinical practice for advanced and metastatic cancers in the U.S. and can help identify clinically actionable alterations in patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. CGP can also complement clinicopathological findings and in certain cases, may lead to diagnostic recharacterization resulting in more precise therapeutic strategies. Here, we highlight examples where molecular findings resulted in tumor re-evaluation and subsequent recharacterization. Twenty-eight cases where CGP results were inconsistent with initial pathological diagnosis and clinical presentation were selected for secondary clinicopathological review to explore alternative diagnostic explanations more consistent with the genomic results. Genomic profiling identified clinically actionable and prognostic variants leading to more accurate therapeutic recommendations based on the updated diagnoses highlighting the value of CGP beyond biomarker detection for therapy selection and supporting its complementary use in diagnostic confirmation to unveil opportunities for precision medicine strategies.