<p>This study investigates the effect of key manufacturing parameters and graphene nanoparticle additions on the tensile behavior of fiber metal laminates (FMLs) using a Taguchi-based experimental design. Several manufacturing parameters were considered: laminate configuration (glass fiber and hybrid glass-carbon fiber reinforcement), aluminum surface treatment (chemical treatment and laser surface texturing with scanning spacings of 1&#xa0;mm and 2&#xa0;mm), aluminum thickness (0.5, 0.7, and 1.0&#xa0;mm), graphene nanoparticle content (0, 0.1, and 0.25 wt%), and curing pressure (2, 5, and 7&#xa0;bar). Eighteen FMLs specimens were fabricated according to the Taguchi orthogonal array and tested under tensile loading. Ultimate tensile strength (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:{\upsigma\:}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation><sub>ult</sub>), tensile modulus (<i>E</i>), toughness modulus (U<sub>T</sub>), and failure strain (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\epsilon\:\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation><sub>f</sub>) were evaluated as performance responses. The findings show laminate configuration significantly affects <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:{\upsigma\:}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation><sub>ult</sub>, U<sub>T</sub>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\epsilon\:\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation><sub>f</sub>, with the all-glass fiber configuration exhibiting superior performance responses. Graphene content and curing pressure had a minimal effect on tensile properties. The optimal parameter combination for <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:{\upsigma\:}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation><sub>ult</sub> and U<sub>T</sub> involved a glass fiber laminate configuration with chemically treated aluminum, an aluminum thickness of 0.5&#xa0;mm, 0% graphene, and a curing pressure of 2&#xa0;bar. Optimal parameters for <i>E</i> include a laser 1&#xa0;mm scanning texture, glass fiber laminate configuration, aluminum thickness of 0.5&#xa0;mm, 0% graphene nanoparticles, and a curing pressure of 5&#xa0;bar. Additionally, optimal parameters for <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\epsilon\:\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation><sub>f</sub> are glass fiber configuration, chemical surface treatment, aluminum thickness of 1&#xa0;mm, 0% graphene, and curing pressure of 2&#xa0;bar. Validation tests indicated the model’s predictions were accurate, with prediction errors under 5%, highlighting its statistical reliability.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Influence of curing pressure and surface treatment on mechanical properties of hybrid fiber metal laminates

  • M. Megahed,
  • A. M. Alsaeedy,
  • A. E. Alshorbagy,
  • M. Atta

摘要

This study investigates the effect of key manufacturing parameters and graphene nanoparticle additions on the tensile behavior of fiber metal laminates (FMLs) using a Taguchi-based experimental design. Several manufacturing parameters were considered: laminate configuration (glass fiber and hybrid glass-carbon fiber reinforcement), aluminum surface treatment (chemical treatment and laser surface texturing with scanning spacings of 1 mm and 2 mm), aluminum thickness (0.5, 0.7, and 1.0 mm), graphene nanoparticle content (0, 0.1, and 0.25 wt%), and curing pressure (2, 5, and 7 bar). Eighteen FMLs specimens were fabricated according to the Taguchi orthogonal array and tested under tensile loading. Ultimate tensile strength ( \(\:{\upsigma\:}\) ult), tensile modulus (E), toughness modulus (UT), and failure strain ( \(\:\epsilon\:\) f) were evaluated as performance responses. The findings show laminate configuration significantly affects \(\:{\upsigma\:}\) ult, UT, and \(\:\epsilon\:\) f, with the all-glass fiber configuration exhibiting superior performance responses. Graphene content and curing pressure had a minimal effect on tensile properties. The optimal parameter combination for \(\:{\upsigma\:}\) ult and UT involved a glass fiber laminate configuration with chemically treated aluminum, an aluminum thickness of 0.5 mm, 0% graphene, and a curing pressure of 2 bar. Optimal parameters for E include a laser 1 mm scanning texture, glass fiber laminate configuration, aluminum thickness of 0.5 mm, 0% graphene nanoparticles, and a curing pressure of 5 bar. Additionally, optimal parameters for \(\:\epsilon\:\) f are glass fiber configuration, chemical surface treatment, aluminum thickness of 1 mm, 0% graphene, and curing pressure of 2 bar. Validation tests indicated the model’s predictions were accurate, with prediction errors under 5%, highlighting its statistical reliability.