<p>This study evaluates wellpoint and drain dewatering systems through laboratory experiments and sequentially coupled flow–deformation numerical modeling at full-scale geometry (× 20). A 1/20-scale physical model with sixteen pumping wells and six observation wells monitored groundwater drawdown around a 30 × 30 cm<sup>2</sup> excavation. The internal deep drain (h1) achieved the greatest groundwater reduction and highest vertical base settlement (ratio <i>U</i><sub><i>v</i></sub><sup><i>max</i></sup>/<i>U</i><sub><i>h</i></sub><sup><i>max</i></sup> = 2.48; 81.8% increase relative to the dry reference), whereas the wellpoint system minimized lateral wall displacement while maintaining moderate uplift (<i>U</i><sub><i>v</i></sub><sup><i>max</i></sup>/<i>U</i><sub><i>h</i></sub><sup><i>max</i></sup> = 2.55; 24.6% rate of change), providing balanced internal stress reduction with lower shear and bending forces. Construction sequencing significantly influenced excavation response: pre-dewatering (“dewatering then excavation”) reduced excavation uplift by up to − 283.5% compared with the dry reference, while the global factor of safety remained nearly insensitive (&lt; 0.86% variation). These results indicate that combining the wellpoint system with optimized execution sequencing offers the most effective strategy to control groundwater, limit lateral wall movements, and reduce basal heave in excavations in loose to medium-dense sandy soils.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Experimental assessment and sequential flow–deformation analysis of dewatering strategies in sheet pile-supported excavations

  • Mostefa Hani,
  • Burak Evirgen,
  • Mustafa Tuncan,
  • Ammar Alnmr,
  • Ahmed Belaadi,
  • Yazid Chetbani,
  • Djamel Ghernaout,
  • Herbert Mukalazi

摘要

This study evaluates wellpoint and drain dewatering systems through laboratory experiments and sequentially coupled flow–deformation numerical modeling at full-scale geometry (× 20). A 1/20-scale physical model with sixteen pumping wells and six observation wells monitored groundwater drawdown around a 30 × 30 cm2 excavation. The internal deep drain (h1) achieved the greatest groundwater reduction and highest vertical base settlement (ratio Uvmax/Uhmax = 2.48; 81.8% increase relative to the dry reference), whereas the wellpoint system minimized lateral wall displacement while maintaining moderate uplift (Uvmax/Uhmax = 2.55; 24.6% rate of change), providing balanced internal stress reduction with lower shear and bending forces. Construction sequencing significantly influenced excavation response: pre-dewatering (“dewatering then excavation”) reduced excavation uplift by up to − 283.5% compared with the dry reference, while the global factor of safety remained nearly insensitive (< 0.86% variation). These results indicate that combining the wellpoint system with optimized execution sequencing offers the most effective strategy to control groundwater, limit lateral wall movements, and reduce basal heave in excavations in loose to medium-dense sandy soils.