Scholarlink

<p>To address the lack of systematic evaluation instruments for assessing the “practical effectiveness” of low-carbon construction technologies (LCCTs) in the construction engineering sector, this study aims to develop a comprehensive evaluation scale. Based on the anomaly-seeking approach, a theoretical framework encompassing four dimensions—technology, organization, environment, and society—was developed through the extensive observation of research phenomena, the examination of underlying patterns within these phenomena, and their reinterpretation through alternative theoretical lenses. Subsequently, the scale was subjected to multi-stage empirical testing using content validity assessment, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The results demonstrate that the proposed scale exhibits strong reliability, validity, and structural stability, and is capable of effectively characterizing the effectiveness of LCCTs in construction engineering. By approaching low-carbon construction from an “effectiveness” perspective, this study expands the scope of low-carbon construction research and provides quantitative tool support for project-level low-carbon performance diagnosis, optimization of management decision-making, and policy formulation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Development and validation of an effectiveness evaluation scale for low-carbon construction technologies in building engineering based on multi-stage empirical evidence

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月23日

查看全文
  • Yikun Su,
  • Zhongjie Sun,
  • Junhao Liu,
  • Zhizhe Zheng

摘要

To address the lack of systematic evaluation instruments for assessing the “practical effectiveness” of low-carbon construction technologies (LCCTs) in the construction engineering sector, this study aims to develop a comprehensive evaluation scale. Based on the anomaly-seeking approach, a theoretical framework encompassing four dimensions—technology, organization, environment, and society—was developed through the extensive observation of research phenomena, the examination of underlying patterns within these phenomena, and their reinterpretation through alternative theoretical lenses. Subsequently, the scale was subjected to multi-stage empirical testing using content validity assessment, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The results demonstrate that the proposed scale exhibits strong reliability, validity, and structural stability, and is capable of effectively characterizing the effectiveness of LCCTs in construction engineering. By approaching low-carbon construction from an “effectiveness” perspective, this study expands the scope of low-carbon construction research and provides quantitative tool support for project-level low-carbon performance diagnosis, optimization of management decision-making, and policy formulation.