Scholarlink

<p>An accurate and precise analytical method was established for the determination of fenuron in carrot juice samples. Salt-assisted switchable solvent-liquid phase microextraction (SA-SS-LPME) was performed to achieve a lower detection limit. Three different calibration methods were compared to quadruple isotope dilution (ID<sup>4</sup>) in terms of accuracy and precision. Under the optimum SA-SS-LPME-GC-MS conditions, the linear range, coefficient of determination, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were calculated as 0.12–2.85&#xa0;mg/kg, 0.9988, 0.05&#xa0;mg/kg and 0.15&#xa0;mg/kg via the external standard calibration method, respectively. In addition, the internal calibration strategy was also implemented and the linear range, coefficient of determination, LOD and LOQ were found to be 0.12–5.13&#xa0;mg/kg, 0.99996, 0.05&#xa0;mg/kg and 0.17&#xa0;mg/kg, respectively. Percent recovery results were recorded as 104.5%–118.1% (± 1.9–7.2) via the external standard calibration, 75.1%–115.0% (± 1.7–6.2) via the matrix–matching calibration, 89.7%–100.7% (± 1.8–6.3) via the internal standard calibration and 99.6%–102.0% (± 1.2–2.3) via the ID<sup>4</sup> strategy. The recovery results obtained using the ID<sup>4</sup> strategy demonstrate the advantage of integrating SA-SS-LPME-GC-MS with this approach.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Assessing calibration methods for fenuron determination in carrot juice via GC–MS with salt-assisted switchable solvent microextraction

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月2日

查看全文
  • Süleyman Bodur,
  • Sezin Erarpat Bodur,
  • Sude Oflu,
  • Ömer Tahir Günkara,
  • Sezgin Bakırdere

摘要

An accurate and precise analytical method was established for the determination of fenuron in carrot juice samples. Salt-assisted switchable solvent-liquid phase microextraction (SA-SS-LPME) was performed to achieve a lower detection limit. Three different calibration methods were compared to quadruple isotope dilution (ID4) in terms of accuracy and precision. Under the optimum SA-SS-LPME-GC-MS conditions, the linear range, coefficient of determination, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were calculated as 0.12–2.85 mg/kg, 0.9988, 0.05 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg via the external standard calibration method, respectively. In addition, the internal calibration strategy was also implemented and the linear range, coefficient of determination, LOD and LOQ were found to be 0.12–5.13 mg/kg, 0.99996, 0.05 mg/kg and 0.17 mg/kg, respectively. Percent recovery results were recorded as 104.5%–118.1% (± 1.9–7.2) via the external standard calibration, 75.1%–115.0% (± 1.7–6.2) via the matrix–matching calibration, 89.7%–100.7% (± 1.8–6.3) via the internal standard calibration and 99.6%–102.0% (± 1.2–2.3) via the ID4 strategy. The recovery results obtained using the ID4 strategy demonstrate the advantage of integrating SA-SS-LPME-GC-MS with this approach.