Scholarlink

<p>The white cane is a fundamental mobility aid for individuals with visual impairments. While previous studies have examined cane characteristics, the ergonomic interaction between handle angle and usage technique remains underexplored. This quasi‑experimental study investigated the effects of white cane handle angle and technique on upper-limb posture, discomfort, and usability. Sixteen visually impaired participants completed eight experimental conditions combining four handle angles (0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°) with two cane techniques (two-point touch and constant contact) while walking an eight-meter path. Wrist flexion/extension, wrist radial/ulnar deviation, and elbow flexion/extension were measured using a twin-axis Biometrics electrogoniometer. Discomfort and usability were assessed using the Persian version of the Borg’s Category Ratio-scale-10 (P-Borg CR-10) and the Persian version of the System Usability Scale (P-SUS), respectively. Significant main effects of handle angle and cane technique were observed on upper-limb posture. Handle angle significantly influenced wrist flexion/extension and ulnar deviation, while cane technique affected all posture variables. A significant interaction between handle angle and technique was found for elbow posture. Although angled handles reduced discomfort in some regions, they increased it in others. Notably, the traditional 0° handle achieved the highest usability ratings. These findings demonstrate an ergonomic trade-off between biomechanical improvement and perceived usability, highlighting the importance of considering both handle design and cane technique.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effects of white cane handle angle and technique on upper limb biomechanics and comfort in visually impaired users

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月29日

查看全文
  • Zeinab Rasouli Kahaki,
  • Alireza Choobineh,
  • Mohsen Razeghi,
  • Haleh Ghaem,
  • Mohsen Salehi,
  • Hamid Jahangiri,
  • Hadi Daneshmandi

摘要

The white cane is a fundamental mobility aid for individuals with visual impairments. While previous studies have examined cane characteristics, the ergonomic interaction between handle angle and usage technique remains underexplored. This quasi‑experimental study investigated the effects of white cane handle angle and technique on upper-limb posture, discomfort, and usability. Sixteen visually impaired participants completed eight experimental conditions combining four handle angles (0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°) with two cane techniques (two-point touch and constant contact) while walking an eight-meter path. Wrist flexion/extension, wrist radial/ulnar deviation, and elbow flexion/extension were measured using a twin-axis Biometrics electrogoniometer. Discomfort and usability were assessed using the Persian version of the Borg’s Category Ratio-scale-10 (P-Borg CR-10) and the Persian version of the System Usability Scale (P-SUS), respectively. Significant main effects of handle angle and cane technique were observed on upper-limb posture. Handle angle significantly influenced wrist flexion/extension and ulnar deviation, while cane technique affected all posture variables. A significant interaction between handle angle and technique was found for elbow posture. Although angled handles reduced discomfort in some regions, they increased it in others. Notably, the traditional 0° handle achieved the highest usability ratings. These findings demonstrate an ergonomic trade-off between biomechanical improvement and perceived usability, highlighting the importance of considering both handle design and cane technique.